Post #47 and #48 you said No to if you opened the lid to look at them , I'm confused , aside from the tail injury they look great at what point did you weigh them
I don't tend to see aesthetics as being particularly unimportant. At the very least, it's a matter of principle. Paying for one thing and receiving another shouldn't be acceptable. Assuming that that's what happened here.
Sorry post #1 you weighed them as soon as you got home.
I am very new to Crested Geckos and I just started getting into them. I have been doing a ton of research and talking to a bunch of crested gecko breeders.
The female was advertised as just about ready to breed and she is 25 grams (I weighed her when I got her home)
I didn't even take them out of their deli cups or look at them because I was running errands so they were sitting on the back seat of my aunts car while we went doing our errands and we were gone for a good 2 hours and then when I got home I had to eat dinner so they sat on my bed THEN I went and looked at them and weighed them, then noticing that the male's tail was all crooked when I put him on the scale.
Mistyck if you look at the darn pictures. It says that HIS picture was taken on FEBRUARY 10th! MY picture was taken on February 12th the day he DELIVERED. You still keep thinking that his picture was taken the day he delivered it WASN'T. Get it?
I am very new to Crested Geckos and I just started getting into them. I have been doing a ton of research and talking to a bunch of crested gecko breeders. I got a couple breeding pairs from a friend who is local to me so she is always there to help me. ANYWAY, I bought a pair of what was described in their descriptions as Extreme Harlequins from Apex Reptile Center on Facebook ran by Steven Patterson.
Actually apex did say they were sold to him as extremes and that's what he sold them as, this was earlier in the post. Maybe it doesn't say it on that exact ad but it was said that he sold them as extremes.You DID NOT look at the gecko when you received him. Period.
What part of that are you not getting?
Could it have been there when you received him? Yes.
Can you be certain? No
IMO, you have no proof that the seller intentionally sold you a kinked gecko.
Then, there is this LIE.
It is an outright lie, according to the proof YOU posted in the form of the ad.
You no longer have any credibility with me.
I posted the screen shot of the male I bought. That screen shot was of the male with floppy tail syndrome
Snake-Queen what on earth are you talking about? That picture of the harley male is not who i bought, you just made yourself look so ignorant right now.
AphroditeGeckos said:I don't even care anymore.
AphroditeGeckos said:Like I said in my last post, no need to respond anymore. This is over and done with, if I could delete it I would.
Even to my untrained eye, they don't look remotely alike. You did label the picture as "FTS gecko."AphroditeGeckos said:Snake-Queen what on earth are you talking about? That picture of the harley male is not who i bought.
Is it a hit to one's credibility, being more interested in making a point that has no factual basis than they are in putting forth the effort to actually understand a given situation? If not, I'm thinking it should be..Snake-Queen said:You no longer have any credibility with me.
Yeah, I think this one got away from some of us. Some people will just do anything to avoid admitting that they were in the wrong.ElexisOrtiz said:It's funny how everyone is attacking this girl.
More of the grasping-at-imaginary-straws nonsense that made you look foolish to begin with. Since you're trying to paint the picture that 3 hours in a deli cup is somehow analogous to mistreatment, the points on shipping are absolutely valid. Not being an "ideal" scenario doesn't equate to being a bad one. Not even close.Snake-Queen said:Any argument about shipping is null, these were not shipped. Picking them up in person is usually ideal, as the buyer can inspect them before taking final possession of them. The OP chose not to do so, instead, she put them in the back seat of a vehicle, in the winter time & ran errands. When returning home, instead of finally inspecting them, they are left on her bed while she ate dinner.
They were sold to me as extreme Harley's from guyco geckos. Jon and Guy and good friends of mine so I know I did not represent the animal wrong, unless somehow they did.
The seller admitted that he represented them as extremes. But it's okay, don't bother to actually read the thread. I'll do the work for you. Wouldn't want you to sprain anything while trying to fumble your way through what's been posted. You're welcome.Snake-Queen said:Where is this ad, that states it is an extreme? You have plenty of screenshots of ads that do not pertain to your sale.
ya ya ya. I've read that over and over at this point ya'll are just boring me.
I'm also a pretty hands-on person, but what we're inclined to do isn't necessarily relevant here. Sensibilities vary. I think it's a huge stretch, to say that that equates to any degree of indifference to the animal's well-being. A clear deli cup gives a good enough view to see any major issues that would tend to jump out at someone. You can tell skin tone/hydration, level of alertness and activity, fat deposits, etc. I just don't believe that a possible deficit in a buyer's diligence shouldn't inherently pardon a seller who may have supplied a sub-par animal.It just sounds sketchy to me to get a brand new animal and not want to take it out and look at it. Especially as a new reptile owner, I wouldn't be able to wait to take them out and check them.
The quoted text I have used is about as good of an example as there is. Does this sound like a credible person you would trust in a "word against word" situation? If you do that's your business, but notice everyone refers to her as a "girl," not a "woman." There is a very good reason for that, and it's because she sounds like an irresponsible child who should probably not own animals.
Since you bring up one's tone, no issue with the F-bombs that the seller dropped in their correspondence? Although we don't have the whole convo, I do find it noteworthy that people who'd normally jump all over that are oddly silent about it. It's pretty rare that I find myself thinking that everyone's missed the whole point and went after someone who wasn't deserving of it. This is just one of the situations where that's exactly the conclusion that I've come to. As I'd already said, I'm just not seeing what most of you are.
There's a definite fluster-factor to these situations. Sometimes, it's just too hard to resist giving back what you're getting. All things considered, she's handled herself better than some seasoned vets that find their way onto the BOI.
Actually, there are several snippets of their conversations posted in this thread. Really look through this thread and tell me it's not uncanny how people are managing to miss so much. It's not even a very long thread, and so much is being conveniently overlooked. Anyway, none of the snippets that I've seen have shown the buyer to be even slightly aggressive. The seller said that she was "extremely rude" to him. Where's his proof that what she said justified his response? Why is no one clamoring for that? See, that's part of my point. People seem to be going out of their way to focus on OP's words with extreme prejudice, but the seller is somehow free from the need to back up what he says. It seems to have been decided that somehow the OP was the default loser nearly from the beginning. This seems like the BOI thread from Bizarro World.The reason I had no issue with that is because somehow that's the only snippet we received from the buyer.
Guess we're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this. No one's presented a single point that makes me reconsider my absolute belief that some of you are seriously reaching for what's not there. We're clearly seeing two entirely different things here.Intentionally leaving them in a deli cup on the back seat of a car for 3 hours instead of getting them into a proper habitat, when you have full ability to do so, is extremely irresponsible.
My specific living situation allows me to see what she's said as an extremely plausible scenario. I'm by no means a weak-willed person, but living with those who have mental illnesses can work to derail your own life and make it more about them. If it's not something you've dealt with, count yourself lucky.Oh, and the whole "demented grandmother" who they have to do whatever she says or she flips out and they have to fear for their life, and that's why she has to drive around with reptiles in the back seat? Come on.
Hardly. I've read an ungodly amount of these threads. As often as not, if people want what you're selling, it's amazing what they're willing to look past.Keep in mind though, those are the same people who end up getting blacklisted because you see what type of person they really are.
What bends one man may just break another. However, I've yet to see this "snap." It comes across to me as little more than frustrated disbelief. But maybe I'm just projecting, much like many of you are doing.I didn't see anyone push her so far that she would snap for no reason, but she has anyway (to some extent).