Dennis Hultman
New member
Matt has changed his user name on ebay. He his now doing business under the name insanetargets.
Dennis Hultman said:Matt has changed his user name on ebay. He his now doing business under the name insanetargets.
guess we all mess up once in awhile but it seems 85-95% u need to throw in the towel. IMHO after reading all these posts on him i cant believe were still getting new posters on here saying bad guy every one should know by know. think we all should chip in on advertisement or banner for just for his rep. but that of course is a joke. glad once again this is here more ppl need to bring there bad situations here.The following message was sent to you via the FaunaClassifieds Contact Us form by Matt Graybeal.
--------------------------------
Hello Rich,
I wanted to notify you that you must close the thread about me as long as I am unable to post. You and I both know that this is not the way the law works. Since I am unable to post my side of the story or view the thread there could be information that is not correct or down right slanderous. Also I have been informed that there have been several trader ratings about me that are incorrect as well and woud liek them removed. I honestly did not want to bring fauna into the legal battle I am persuing but if you cannot fix the problem that is exactly what I will have to do. My hand is being forced on this one and have no choice. I will give you until Monday March 26th at noon to lock the thread. Thank you!
-Matt Graybeal
--------------------------------
Referring Page: http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/traderratings.php?u=6892
IP Address: 75.108.89.24
User Name: Unregistered
User ID: 0
DThomas said:There is no legal battle. No attorney worth the money he would be paying him would allow him to send such a demand. At the very least, it would have come from the attorney himself in the form of a formal demand letter, sent certified mail.
But he does get one thing right in his email to you though. He is dead on with this one statement "You and I both know that this is not the way the law works." His own grammatical error made it a true statement and I seriously doubt he even gets it. He demands you lock the thread and in the next sentence tells you the law doesn't work that way. Basically telling you you have no obligation to close the thread. His ignorance is absolutely amazing.
[Extreme Sarcastic Tone]DThomas said:His ignorance is absolutely amazing.

He's banned because he threw in Kelli's face the donation he made to her when her son was taken in a tragic accident. That is the lowest form of attack I have ever seen and it was the last straw for him here. Coincidently, Kelli has no record of ever receiving money from him during that time frame so it can't even be confirmed he even made the donation. That would make the attack that much more worse in my book.dallas spergin said:i for 1 would like to see him tell his side and then u guys goat it this mainly is why i read these i buy from trusted ppl so i might come to check on a new person with low feedback but anyways, why cant he post? im in the dark on why he is banned so far be it for me to imply anything just curious what else he has to say to the ppl on here who he has wronged or whatever. thats just my opinion.![]()
Seriously, go search on his name and read the numerous threads here. He HAS told his side of the story, many, many times. How many times do we need to see the same old crap, lies, and attacks from him? It gets tiresome after awhile.dallas spergin said:i for 1 would like to see him tell his side
looking for drama but as u said alot of it here already i agreeDThomas said:Seriously, go search on his name and read the numerous threads here. He HAS told his side of the story, many, many times. How many times do we need to see the same old crap, lies, and attacks from him? It gets tiresome after awhile.

The following message was sent to you via the FaunaClassifieds Contact Us form by Matt Graybeal.
--------------------------------
Hello Rich,
I wanted to notify you that you must close the thread about me as long as I am unable to post. You and I both know that this is not the way the law works. Since I am unable to post my side of the story or view the thread there could be information that is not correct or down right slanderous. Also I have been informed that there have been several trader ratings about me that are incorrect as well and woud liek them removed. I honestly did not want to bring fauna into the legal battle I am persuing but if you cannot fix the problem that is exactly what I will have to do. My hand is being forced on this one and have no choice. I will give you until Monday March 26th at noon to lock the thread. Thank you!
-Matt Graybeal
--------------------------------
Referring Page: http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/for...ings.php?u=6892
IP Address: 75.108.89.24
User Name: Unregistered
User ID: 0
Originally Posted by MGReptiles
Do you really think that this site can harm my business?? Are you in some other dimension where people like lilly, sharp, jim o and Dennis matter..lol..
Originally Posted by MGReptiles
Um No sorry.. 80% of the business I do is to Universitys not to individulas. It has been this way for a year and a half now. Business has not been slow it has been normal.
Originally Posted by MGReptiles
So with that being said it really isn't any skin off my teeth no matter what is said here or on any other forum that is trying to copy the BOI. I just don't have the time or heart to worry about the BOI, it is just not an important fact of normal peoples lives.
Originally Posted by MGReptiles
I dont do damage control no need to, no damage done in the eyes of the people emailing and PMing me.
Originally Posted by MGReptiles
Anywho, gotta run, have more important thing to do then play with the kiddies(read 10 or so people, heck email me for a list) on the BOI(just wanted to drop in and stir the crap alittle)

Dr Owens said:However, if you wanted to take all of the wind out of his argument, you could just make him pay a fine (hopefully a hefty one) in order to return. If he chooses not to pay the fine, then it's his decision, and his decision alone not to return. He couldn't sue you for a decision that he made...even if he wanted to.
WebSlave said:I agree with this suggestion. And I have done as you have suggested by changing the permanent ban to a fine and suspension instead. The fine stands at the standard $50 which was put in place when the enhanced warning point system was implemented. I believe this is fair to do.
