• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Chad Lendon - INFO

I can respect a call to responsible field collecting. You could have started a general post in the appropriate forum. Would have been time spent wisely.



Chad W. said:
The truth is that I have not contacted TPWD because a buddy of mine brought forth a decent argument to your defense. Go try to retrieve any info that I have given TPWD, you will fail. You can consider it my objective nature that stopped me from pursuing it as I stated...

Good to know that some good reasoning prevailed. It is equally good to know that your word is meaningless.


Chad W. said:
I've forwarded this post and a few others in which you've delightfully incriminated yourself...To various TP&WL Conservation Officers. I already got a response! Sweet!

So now they are FULLY aware of your ILLEGAL activities, and needless to say, you're going down brother.
 
BTW chad...let your sweetie courtney (fitting name) know to expect a little page on my website dedicated to you two..I have had over 5000 hits..in just a few months, hope ya'll like the exposuer..I'll keep it on there for a little while until I feel necessarry to take it down..
Best Regards
 
If this guy is using multiple accounts and not his real name he should be banned..Plain and simple..can I get a mod's opinion on this? Dennis what do you think would be appropriate.
BTW sorry for not sticking to the TOS , those warning points you sent me were well deserved, I will try to tone it down in the future..this guy just got under my last scale.
 
Wilomn said:
I beleive chadwicke's last name is Whitney.

The last name thing may be a result of seperated parents... I'm not certain about that but I believe I remember his discussing that at times prior to his turning eighteen. One parent or the other having his last name changed to reflect something other than what he was used to calling himself... or it may have been just after he turned eighteen, having it changed to reflect one or the other.

... or I might be remembering someone else completely and just attributing it to him because of the two he's used here. I sometimes have a tough time keeping track of the people I have run into on internet forums and through chats that I haven't frequented in years. In 1998 it all seemed a lot less important to screenshot everything and memorize details.
 
Justin Mitcham said:
If this guy is using multiple accounts and not his real name he should be banned..Plain and simple..can I get a mod's opinion on this? Dennis what do you think would be appropriate.
We'll have to see what he says about his name. There is no hard rule against having multiple accounts except when they are made to by-pass a suspension or ban. Remember, Rich granted a blanket amnesty a few months back and that is why his first account is no longer suspended.

monkeywrench133 said:
Interesting. Would it be possible for Dennis T to un-delete the 6 posts he made in Courtney's thread?
Those were "hard" edits so that would not be possible. They are gone for good.
 
I located a Chad M Whitney at

RR3 BOX 220
MEMPHIS, MO 63555

DOB 08/13/1984

He was arrested for DUI and charges filed on 09/08/06. It is scheduled for trial on 05/22/07. Not saying these two are the same person.

Follow the link and enter the name Chad Whitney and you will see the same person has 3 traffic violations. The fourth one is from Texas and is too old.

http://www.courts.mo.gov/casenet/cases/searchCases.do?searchType=name
 
Well our hcad on this forum is
Birthday:
3/18/1984
Full Name:
Chad Lendon
Location:
Midwest

What a coincidink same first name, same last name, born the same year.
In fact switch around the3 and the 8 and they will be born the same day.

I am not saying they are the same person.
But if they truly are different people..... I was just saying its like the twilight zone. After all this world is only so big. It is conceivable that they are different people
 
Interesting thanks Dennis I owe you! 16,000 people die every year from DUI's and he is worried about me?
Is that you?
 
Jeez after 55 posts in this thread alone and having to decipher exactly what Chad is trying to accomplish. I have yet to see one shread of evidence to support his ramblings. I don't know Justin from anyone else but he said he isn't breaking any laws. Chad you have to show some proof. Your buddy has provided only hearsay evidence in your Quest to expose Justin as a wildlife outlaw. Where is the link to this supposed pending legislation. I would love to see this. Hell I would love to see 1 peice of Hard evidence. Oh btw Happy Easter All
 
Look at you all running around trying to figure out who I am. This is friggin hilarious. Justin, I will feel honored to have my own section on your site dedicated to me. I will link people to it whenever I can!

So yeah, I did tell a lie when I claimed to have contacted the authorities. Big friggin deal, at least I didn't actually do it. I wouldn't do that to someone without knowing for a fact that they deserve it. I used it as a scare tactic on a public forum that is used for public debates on the subjective opinions that some may have about others. It seems to have worked since Justin has apparently quit collecting these animals. I've found out that there's 100% no doubt that Justin can do nothing to me legally, so I don't regret any of it. I am a concerned individual who used a public means to address a problem that I had with a public user... I've offered Justin ample opportunity to defend his actions with words and logic, but instead he threatens me with legal action to silence me. Well done, I think you deserve everyone's respect for that. :thumbsup:

As I've said before, there has been a vocal minority that has risen to defend Justin, and I don't deny that many of my actions validated this...But any objective reader who cares about conservation will see my logic and I'm sure that they will support me.

Have fun everyone, it's been surreal...
 
Chad W. said:
As I've said before, there has been a vocal minority that has risen to defend Justin, and I don't deny that many of my actions validated this...But any objective reader who cares about conservation will see my logic and I'm sure that they will support me.

I think I'm the only objective reader you had Chad... and I was waiting for you to produce something that strongly evidenced a history of collection beyond what is reasonable and sustainable.

But you've completely failed to produce anything remotely viable and all it'd take to get people giving you an unbiased ear is an... email or chat with Justin claiming to have collected a certain number in a certain timeframe... or the name of a person who witnessed destructive collection or... avaliability lists spaced a short time apart showing a massive influx of field collected animals. Something.

If you actually have something, then throw it out there and it'll be looked at in an even handed manner. If you don't- and the longer you wait before producing something concrete, the less likely it seems that any substance is under this one- then please quit implying that you do.

The way I would have predicted this going down if you'd followed what I'd call your usual method of debate would be accusation of overcollection, followed by a contention of sustainable collection followed by a knock down fight about what constitutes a sustainable population of collareds. You've gotta have *something* though, otherwise you're just pissing into the wind.
 
No with all due respect Chad Your involvement here is personal and you should not claim your actions in the name of conservation. There are bigger violaters out there then Justin. I don't know if he did what you accuse him of our not. The point is you have to prove he did. So far you cannot. As for scare tactics. Lets be real here for a moment shall we. No goverment or law enforcement agencey would act on hearsay. Hell most won't act on animal related issues anyways until there is a public outcry. So far there is none. What you fail to realize is that nobody gives a care without proof. Post some or shut up.. You are only talking to see your words posted. Nobody cares what your opinion is. Here its about truth. This is a waste of the BOI. And as far as scaring Justin with your calling the authorities. You are the one who is scared. Thats why you checked to see if he could do anything to you. Face it your little quest for the saving the wild lizard population has hit a brick wall. Sorry Chad you failed to prove your case...
 
yeah you are right. PETA does the same thing. they lie a lot.

so do the anti gunners. they lie a lot too.
I wouldn't do that to someone without knowing for a fact that they deserve it.
So you admit to lying about him

I used it as a scare tactic on a public forum that is used for public debates on the subjective opinions that some may have about others. It seems to have worked since Justin has apparently quit collecting these animals
UMMM it did not work. he did not stop collecting because of you. Please tell me you are not that dumb to believe he stopped collecting because you are such a hero.

To think, Seamus said you were smart and I almost belived him.

I am a concerned individual who used a public means to address a problem that I had with a public user...
No.... you are an individual who publicly, purposefully and admittedly lied about a person for personal goals.

I've found out that there's 100% no doubt that Justin can do nothing to me legally, so I don't regret any of it.
You publicly, purposefully, and admittedly told lies about a person and you think he can do nothing legal to you? I think it is time for you to get a new adviser.
 
Back
Top