Cat_72
Back from exile :)
You know, even with it being Ed....reading this whole thread, I was almost willing to accept that even though upon close inspection it was obviously a different animal than the one originally pictured, it MAY have been an accident that the wrong one was sent out. Trying to give "benefit of doubt" ad all of that. Sometimes Ed ain't as bright as he thinks he is, maybe he couldn't tell the difference between the 2 animals. Then Ed posts crap like this:
First of all, the was NO legitimate reason to be posting Anna's personal info, other than perhaps intimidation? A little bit of "getting even"? Completely uncalled for, Ed.
Then there's the fact, that once again, Ed is totally and completely ignoring the REAL issues at hand. It is completely obvious that is NOT the animal Anna paid for, yet Ed still maintains it is....if somehow, someway, it was possibly an accident *coughcoughgag* that the wrong animal was sent out, a simple apology, and offer to send the animal Anna actually paid for could have solved the whole matter.
But instead, as usual, Ed avoids the whole matter, and just makes it worse with his continuing to lie about it, thinking someone will be dumb enough to believe it. How many times have I told you, Ed, that a mistake ceases to be a mistake (if it ever was a mistake) when you start telling lies to cover it up instead of making it right? That has certainly become your common modus operandi though, hasn't it? Turn it around on the buyer, never put any of the blame on Ed for Ed's screwups (or flat-out dishonesty, depending on how you look at it). What a crock of
.
And then, of course, the wonderful gift of the baby crested....that doesn't make the deal right in ANY way, shape, or form....if that's what Anna ended up agreeing to in hopes of getting some sort of satisfaction, and perhaps not knowing any better, I guess that's what will make you think you have fulfilled your end of the deal....but it's painfully obvious to others reading that you're just skipping out on your responsibilities again.
You'd think by now, I'd learn that trying to give people like Ed the benefit of doubt would bite me in the ass....
Ed Clark said:
First of all, the was NO legitimate reason to be posting Anna's personal info, other than perhaps intimidation? A little bit of "getting even"? Completely uncalled for, Ed.
Then there's the fact, that once again, Ed is totally and completely ignoring the REAL issues at hand. It is completely obvious that is NOT the animal Anna paid for, yet Ed still maintains it is....if somehow, someway, it was possibly an accident *coughcoughgag* that the wrong animal was sent out, a simple apology, and offer to send the animal Anna actually paid for could have solved the whole matter.
But instead, as usual, Ed avoids the whole matter, and just makes it worse with his continuing to lie about it, thinking someone will be dumb enough to believe it. How many times have I told you, Ed, that a mistake ceases to be a mistake (if it ever was a mistake) when you start telling lies to cover it up instead of making it right? That has certainly become your common modus operandi though, hasn't it? Turn it around on the buyer, never put any of the blame on Ed for Ed's screwups (or flat-out dishonesty, depending on how you look at it). What a crock of
. And then, of course, the wonderful gift of the baby crested....that doesn't make the deal right in ANY way, shape, or form....if that's what Anna ended up agreeing to in hopes of getting some sort of satisfaction, and perhaps not knowing any better, I guess that's what will make you think you have fulfilled your end of the deal....but it's painfully obvious to others reading that you're just skipping out on your responsibilities again.
You'd think by now, I'd learn that trying to give people like Ed the benefit of doubt would bite me in the ass....
