K412 said:
I was concerned because she was not eating and because I did the reasearch and am aware of their appetites.
They do have a very strong feeding response, when kept appropriately. The day they come out of shipping in a new environment after being handled under brighter lights with a camera going off and having tongs bumped into their face? Not so much.
I never put her in a bad enviornment. It is not possible for her to get ill and die from septicemia in a day Ed.
There are strong indications that the environment was far less than ideal. There are doubts about the accuracy of your statements regarding the humidity, you have not indicated the temperature, the placement of the enclosure in your home, you mentioned cleaning the enclosure with a weakened bleach solution, you did note that you used dechlorinated water but have not mentioned any other chemical factors of your tap water... There are a lot of unknowns that might contain factors related directly to the animal's death. You did get a necropsy done and as a generalization, I'd tend to trust them BUT... there's a distinct lessening in the accuracy when looking at an amphibian and there are some questionable areas when it comes to the simple fact that it wasn't done in-house by your own vet. What temperature was it kept at between the time you left it there and the time it was shipped? How was it packaged and shipped? What conditions was it sitting in at the far end? Unfortunately it can't simply be assumed that all precautions were taken to ensure accuracy.
I was concerned because she was letharic, comparing that to my horned frog is an understatement.
It's a cresuscular ambush predator that spends a lot of time sitting in one spot when not actively feeding or breeding. How active and in what way did you expect it to be?
You are relying on my pictures as proof that she was a "healthy" frog but don't bother too look very closely do you.
I know that wasn't directed at me but... I couched my statements regarding the photos with the specific disclaimer that they will never be a substitute for firsthand observation. I also looked closely when they were first posted and again as I read this thread, saw the things you mentioned and checked the enlarged and marked photos Bobby posted. I still respectfully disagree that they show an unhealthy frog.
The frog has a very drowsy glimpse
Little anthropomorphism there... the "expression" of the frog can be easily explained, as they develop fat stores, used in the wild for seasonal aestivation and times when food is tougher to come by, those stores build up pretty visually on the head and neck. This results in the timpanic rolls and the blunter appearance to the head that is seen in adults over frogletts and juveniles. The eyes look fine, the timpanic roll is covering about one third of the timpanum, it's a healthy weight with a nice fat store without being obese.
the left forarm and wrist are reddish and swollen
Couple points on this one- first, in none of the photographs can we see the forearm in the same position, at the same angle. The appearance of one relative to the other cannot be judged accurately as a result. Depending on the position of the leg and the weight dispersal of the frog, the muscles, any fatty tissue and skin can take on different appearances. The "reddish" area on the wrist and around the toes is seen in many, many white's tree frogs, what you are seeing there is the blood vessels and tissue underlying skin that's not pigmented the way the dorsal surface is. Again the positioning can dramatically change the appearance, as a wrist bent in one direction can have a dramatically different coloration than one bent in the other.
Further, and this is just speculation on my part... if you sent a message to Ed worrying about the potential for injury as a result of a fall... and you then see a swollen and red foreleg... Why are you putting the blame on his doorstep?
the nose is reddish (could be a nose rub too)
The area around the nostrils is also thinner skin which will generally show those red or purplish undertones. It's not nose rub. Amphibian skin is thin and delicate to begin with, a whites with nose rub will display clear breaks in the skin and the exposed underlying tissue.
and the skin
is reddish on some parts.
If the color balance of your camera is accurate, it's not any more reddish in any spots where it's unusual or concerning to see than it is on any other healthy frog.
The frog is very weak, check how he sits in the water bowl, he
can hardly support his body.
I suspect you do not have a lot of experience witnessing firsthand the behavior or bosy positioning of these frogs. The head is erect in all the photos on the rock, the forearms and chin are resting on the side of the water bowl in the photos there. None show unusual positioning, none show particular "weakness"
His eyes are "sunken in" a bit.
Nope.
The sticky toe pads look bloodshot, especially on the hands.
Nope. Comments like this are the reason that your knowledge and experience are being questioned. If you are not experienced enough to know what color the feet are with the toes spread, your judgement of proper husbandry and the other conditions is suspect.
And as Kelly stated, the frog never tried to eat something!
Everybody who keeps or kept White's knows how voracious they are.
And how voracious they aren't the day they come out of a shipping box, get overhandled, soaked with water with unknown chemical properties, in an unknown temperature in a brightly lit environment.
[quoteThose can be all signs of the Chytrid Fungus and at least EVERYBODY should
recognize and see that the frog WASN'T HEALTHY as he was alive!!![/quote]
It appears you're taking your subjective interpretation (and misinterpretation) of some visual signs as being proof of the conclusion you desire to draw to the exclusion of a multitude of other possibilities.
In some respects amphibians can be extremely delicate animals and many factors that can contribute negatively to the health of a captive amphibian can result in death in a very very short time frame. Much of what people who are disagreeing with you are noting is that you have not shown anything conclusive to indicate specific fault on Ed's part.
I am genuinely sorry that your frog passed, whites are awesome little animals, I keep a pile of them myself and they have a ton of appeal as pets. While there are a lot of questions here and now about this specific animal, and some doubt has been raised about your experience and knowledge of the species and their husbandry requirements, I don't think you should write the species off entirely. Similarly, while some questions have been raised about the conditions this animal was exposed to, many of those unknowns or conditions about which there is doubt could be cleared up... possibly in the dicsussion forums though, as it would be taking this thread widely off topic.