• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Ed Clark,don't buy frogs from him!

Ed Clark said:
Im one of the very few guys that have been breeding Whites tree frogs for many years.

Very cool, Ed. I know how hard it is to breed and raise frogs. The extremely high level of cleanliness required during the early stages are very difficult to maintain and the time spent is demanding to say the least. Kudos to you!
 
Most people dont understand that breeding frogs is a labor of love.

The food bill every month far exceeds and money recieved selling a frog.

Everyone can not keep a frog alive, its a very specialized hobby and you HAVE to know what your doing to sustain their delicate lives.

Whites tree frogs are very long lived and also very hardy in the right conditions, my oldest whites is around 13 years old now.
 
Ed,
I thought the original pics that Kelly posted after receiving the frog from you were nice, but that one looks great.
It would be great if the Zoo that you say received and tested a large group of frogs from you, out of the same group Kelly's frog came out of would post here and confirm that information. Although if the way similar post's in past threads were handled is any indication of what would happen at this time, they may have a few over zealous members contacting them to verify the information and further question them. I would understand if they want to remain unnamed. Maybe they would be better off emailing one of the well respected members here(like Harald, Seamus, Laura, or Bobby) and they can post the email without the header. That way the Zoo can remain anonymous and verify your claim at the same time.
I really have no experience or knowledge on the matter, but I just can't see where you would be the bad guy in this thread. The fact that the majority of members feel the same way has me thinking my reading comprehension tutor is giving me my moneys worth.
 
Ed-

The frog in the picture you just posted has some of the "red" or "discolored" areas mentioned in earlier posts referencing the health of the frog you shipped to the OP. This frog looks to be in perfect health. Very nice.

Don't know what happened to the one that died...I don't see any type of resolution in the future, as you met your TOS. Hopefully all who read this thread will do so with an open mind.

Not to say that I agree with the way you've conducted yourself in some other deals, but it looks like this is a case where you definitely can't please everyone all the time.
 
I havent heard or rather read anyone suggest that the red coloration of the frog might be due to the undue stress of her overheating the frog by putting her directly under a intense lighting immediately after unpacking.

I have seen whites turn this color from overheating and go right back to their 'happy' color of blue or green whichever they may be.
 
Ed, I am sure that with your superior photography skills you would be more than happy to grace this forum with your morphing pictures, they are so adorable from eggs to tads. We at fatfrogs have asked Ed on numerous occasios to post these pictures as do the other breeders on that forum but he has never obliged us. Ed never spoke to me about the sex of the frog after I recieved her. My only communications with Ed have been via pm and email. I would like you to post proof of this statement Ed. The sex of the frog was determined by my vet here who during the initial necropsy found it unremarkable and recommended pathology. Ed refused to respond to any of my emails or pm's after telling me that he honored his guarantee and would not offer a refund, I posted that response previously but if anyone here would like me to do so again I will. Ed if you would please post the previous pm's that you recieved from me, the ones that I posted your responses to, this would help to clarify the situation. Especially for those who do not believe that I "did my research". I asked alot of questions these frogs, hence the responses that I previously posted.
I won't go quote by quote and take up extra space so I jotted some notes to answer the above questions to the best of my ability, if I have missed one please let me know and I will do so ASAP.
Seamus, you were likely asked if your head was going to explode as a compliment by Jamie, she has never insulted anyone on any of the other forums that we are members on. Please take it as such, she recognizes your level of intelligence as have we all who have read your posts on this thread.
The cost of the frog was 30.00 and the shipping that I paid was 55.00 for a total of 85.00. I explained the need of the necropsy in a previous post. I needed to verify that I did not cause this frog to die. My vet determined the necessity of pathology and I agreed. I needed a clear conscience as I just fell in love with her on sight. I had waited 2 months to get her. As I stated there are no blue phase whites in my area.
There are only 2 places that test for Chytrid Fungus that I found on google and in speaking to Mr. Wood decided that I would use pisces-molecular. He is of enormous comfort and assistance. Their lab is very busy and the results can take 2-4 weeks. I will post the email that he sent to me as it is very informative.
My local vet has never heard of chytrid fungus and I called every one from herp vet connection from here to Richmond and even spoke to the state vet here because I know her personally. She has not heard of it either.
I did ask if these frogs could fall because I have never owned a whites before. I know that they are tree frogs and are able to jump and therefore need a large enclosure which is why I purchased the largest one that I could find. I was very doubtful that she had fallen and was only concerned because of her lethargy. I did attempt to feed her. The morning of her first day here I did open the door to the enclosure while ducked down since I knew she was behind the rockpile. I have long steel tongs and slowly edged my hand up where she could not see me or my hand and moved the cricket back and forth where I knew she could see it. I did not and would never poke, prod or forcefeed an animal, unless it was required to save their life but never to a new frog that didn't "know" me much less have time to acclimate.
I did not state that the frog had bloodshot eyes and neither did Lars. He stated that her sticky toe pads appeared bloodshot.
My horned fogs were treated for CF when I got them. The cranwell was my first frog and he, definitely a male because he calls and is in breeding season so his nuptual pads are quite prominent at the present time. I joined fatfrogs to learn the proper care of these animals since care sheet after care sheet said that a semi aquatic tank and gravel were safe. I use coco fiber only. I removed him from his enclosure and sterilized it and began treating for CF as soon as I read the sticky thread on fatfrogs made by Steven Busch. My ornate female was purchased locally as well and she started treatment the day that I got her.
The treatment for CF is lamasil at spray,not lotion. 10 pumps into 200ml of dechlorinated water. 5 minute soaks for 10 days. After each soak the breeder boxes that were their temporary homes had to be sterilized before placing them back into them. The enviornment can reinfect them and must be sterilized between each treatment. The treatment causes shed and revealed beautiful patterns and a marked color enhancement on my ornate. Their appetites improved and they are both currently doing very well.
I was using the terrarrium that I purchased for the whites with paper towels to keep it as clean as possible, monitor droppings and not to move her around too much. It was large enough so that she had room to move and plenty of places to hide and feel safe.
It was not that bright an enviornment unless she was used to a nearly dark one. I have not seen Ed's enclosure where she was so I do not have that as comparison. My bedroom faces the front of my house and with no trees can get bright which is the reason that I keep my blinds closed and I have purple sheers over them during the day. I live with my daughter and of course have concerns about unwelcomed guests or burglars so we keep the blinds closed throughtout my home all the time.
I had 2 25 watt nightglo bulbs on the canopy top for the terrrarrium. They do not produce much light at all. It is obviously lit when during the day but the enclosure was not in front of a window. It recieved indirect sunlight only.
I took pictures of the necropsy today and hope that they are legible.
necropsypics002.jpg

necropsypics004.jpg

necropsypics005.jpg

necropsypics007.jpg

necropsypics008.jpg

necropsypics009.jpg

Some of them were quite blurry but these were the best ones that I could get. I really wish I owned a scanner.
This is the email sent by Mr. Wood at pisces-molecular, I cannot open the links at home, I don't have the best computer but my friend has a better one, no scanner though, and I opened the links there, I hope the members here are able to open them.
Flag this messageRE: chytrid fungus testingSaturday, August 16, 2008 4:23 PM
From: "John Wood" <[email protected]>Add sender to Contacts To: "'kelly brown'" <[email protected]>Message contains attachmentsPCR_Collection_Protocol_2004.doc (857KB), General Instructions for Collecting 1-1-08.doc (30KB)Dear Kelly,

We would be pleased to PCR test an amphibian sample for Batrachochytrium dendrobaditis for you.



Attached are two files which answer most of the common questions about collecting and preserving samples for B.d. PCR testing. The first is a protocol for collecting amphibian toe clip, skin scrape or skin swab samples for PCR testing from Lauren Livo whom we work with at the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The second file from Pisces continues on from Lauren’s with instructions and information about packaging and sending samples for B.d PCR to us.



Several additional notes beyond what is covered in these two files:



Because our experience with the 2 ml screw-capped microfuge tubes with a captive O-ring gasket recommended in the instruction files has been very positive - nearly zero leaking tubes in thousands of samples - we strongly recommend using these tubes for your samples. In response to requests from many customers who don't want to buy 500 vials at a time, or don't want to spend the time to be sure they're getting the right tubes or ethanol, we are now offering "swab sample collection kits" consisting of 50 2ml screw-cap tubes filled with 1 ml of 70% ethanol; 50 swabs; ziploc bags for everything; and a box that can be used for return shipping to Pisces. The cost of the 50-sample kit is $50 plus shipping.



The "general instruction ..." file specifies the materials for pooling samples, but doesn't yet explain the two alternative sample pooling strategies we have developed and offer. We can pool up to 8 swab samples into one DNA prep+PCR sample. Either you can do the pooling, or we can do it here. Although there is an extra charge if we do the pooling (see below), we generally recommend that new customers let us do it, at least for the first pass of sampling at new sites where nothing is known about the prevalence or severity of B.d. The chytrid PCR assay can detect less than 1 zoospore, so it is extremely sensitive to sample cross-contamination; we have procedures in place to pool samples efficiently without cross-contamination. Also, if we do the pooling, we can pool 1/2 (by volume) of each individual sample. Then if a given pooled sample is PCR positive, we can go back and prep and PCR test the remaining half samples individually. This works out well when one wants to know a true B.d. incidence level without spending lots of money on a large batch of samples that all turn out to be PCR negative.



We do not yet require or have specific sample submission forms; all we require are: 1) The name of the sample submitter; 2) A hard copy list of the number of samples submitted and the individual sample IDs; and 3) To whom the report and the invoice should be sent.



The current price for carrying out the DNA extraction and the chytrid PCR test for samples sent to us is a $20 accession fee per group of samples plus US$27 per sample. For samples that you send as individual samples and we do the pooling, there is additional $35 pooling charge for each group pooled (for example, 8 individual samples pooled into one DNA prep + one PCR test would cost:$35+$27 = $62. For samples sent to us already pooled, the charge is $37/pooled sample. Samples sent in tubes or vials other than those recommended are subject to a 20% surcharge. Samples which leak in transit – and therefore require extensive additional anti-cross contamination measures at Pisces - will be subject to a $250 per batch leak surcharge. If we discover a leak in a sample batch, we will immediately email or call you to report the leak and allow you to decide whether we should proceed, or let you resample and submit another (hopefully) non-leaky batch of samples. Individual swab sample collection kits are $50 per 50 samples, plus shipping. Kits for customer pooled samples (50 ml tubes with 70% ethanol and 8 swabs per tube, instructions) are $80 for 10 pooled samples.



Our terms are: Payment is due upon receipt of the sample test results report. All we require from new customers is a name and address to send the invoice to, and a P.O. number if required by the customer. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept credit card payments at this time. Samples should be packed per the instructions in the "General instructions" and shipped FedEx, DHL or UPS; 2nd day delivery is fine.



Our normal turn-around time from receipt is two to four weeks. However during the summer field season, or in the fall when all the field season samples have been sent in, our turn-around can slow to four to six weeks (our current turn-around time as of 8/16/08 for normal samples is ~4 weeks). If you have a need for faster results, for animals in quarantine or a report deadline, please call us. Although we haven’t completely formalized our rush sample times and charges, we can very likely work something out that meets your needs – our fastest sample turnaround time to date was 9 hours (FedEx Priority delivery of the samples in the morning; PCR results emailed by 6 PM!) (currently we have been quoting < 1 week turnaround for $54/sample and < 48 hr turnaround for $108/sample). We will email and/or send out a signed hard copy of the test results report, whichever is needed by the sample submitter. Test results are kept confidential and not shared with anyone other than the sample submitter or their organization without express permission from the submitter.



(Kelly, since your tree frog has already died, a toe clip sample will work better than a belly skin swab. The file from Lauren Livo does explain how to collect a toe clip. You will need to preserve it in ethanol. If you can't get any lab grade 70% or 95% ethanol, "Everclear" from a liquor store will work; it is 95% alcohol. Please make sure that you do not dilute the alcohol you use with tap water that contains chlorine; chlorine will destroy the DNA in the sample!)



Let me know if I've missed anything important or you have any more questions. We look forward to being of service to you.



Thank you,



John Wood

Pisces Molecular

2200 Central Avenue, Suite F

Boulder, CO 80301

USA

v: 303-546-9300; f: 303-546-9400



I hope that this is sufficient to answer the questions that everyone here has asked of me, again if I have not please ask again.
Ed, please take the time to read this as well as to answer the questions that I have asked you in the previous threads.
 
GOLDENSERPENT said:
I havent heard or rather read anyone suggest that the red coloration of the frog might be due to the undue stress of her overheating the frog by putting her directly under a intense lighting immediately after unpacking.

I have seen whites turn this color from overheating and go right back to their 'happy' color of blue or green whichever they may be.

The redness is also apparent in the pictures taken of her while on the bottom of the tank. She was not over heated or dehydrated.
 
GOLDENSERPENT said:
How about this for a suggestion and this has happened to me at least twice.

The girl bought a whites tree frog for 80.00 WHAT??
called it an austrailian but it looks just like the indonesians that everyone gets wildcaught.

She more than likely went to a show or found some cheaper and when it died decided to recover some overspent money.

I am not saying that is what happened but merely suggesting another scenario. Otherwise why all the expense for proving Ed wrong for a 15.00 frog that she paid 80.00 for and now has upwards of 300.00 into and no frog.

If the frog was indeed that sick when Ed sent it it surely would have died if not in transit surely the same day. and the length of the two frogs in the photos look totally different although it could be something to with angles of the photo. I am not an expert by any means with photography.
Also girl stated she put the frog in the vivarium as soon as she got it but yet the second photo shows a flat tank with papertowels not a planted vivarium.
Just a thought.
Jewell

She can ask for the money all she wants but we all know Ed is not doing any refunds. So... Exactly why would she go through the expense. We all know Eds track record and for those of us that don't we probably shouldn't be lending our 2 cents. Do you own white's? Do you know how hard it is to find a blue phase? I might pay 80 for one too if I can find it locally. IT IS THE SAME FROG. Ed has not denied that fact so why are people still mentioning it? It's a camera angle thing, that's it . It's also the same tank in the second photo, a vivarium with paper towels on the bottom and a few plastic plants laying around. As for overheating the frog, it's unlikely I believe she said she was using a 50 watt bulb. I have 100 watts on my savannahs tank that barely heat it to 80. I have two 75s on my bearded dragon tank that only heat to 95. :shrug01:
 
I never stated that I had a planted viv. I did say that I would do that in the future but since I had just gotten her I chose to use paper towels for the above reasons.
The picture of hre deceased was taken in the bottom left hand corner of the tank behind the rockpile that she was on shortly before she died.
 
You said you treated your other frogs. Was this a precautionary measure, or did you previously have frogs w/ Chytrid Fungus? Forgive me if this has already been addressed.

Alot can happen in transit...stress, heat, etc...I think it is possible that neither you nor Ed are directly to blame. This may just be an unfortunate turn of events, and while Ed may not be directly at fault (based on what I read here), his ignoring you did not help.

I think at this point, it may be best to wait for the report to come back from the lab.
 
I agree completely. I did treat my frogs as a preventative measure because chytrid is so wide spread among wc and cb amphibians. They never had any signs of illness but since it needs stress or filthy living conditions to overcome the frog. I have an evacuation kit for both of my horned frogs and if ever they were to be stressed it would be from being in a breeder box and out of their normal surroundings!
From what I recall once treated the chances of them having or getting it is slim to none I don't want to chance it.
 
Stating right up front that i know nothing about frogs, I have a question for those that do. Other than some minuscule discolorations that have been pretty well explained, there do not seem to be any breaks in the skin on the frog in any of the pics I have seen. I do not believe that the OP mentioned any either. The pics supplied were taken within half a day of the frog's demise.

The vet report refers to multiple acute and multifocal ulcerations and abrasions. That would translate to severe breakdown of the skin in multiple areas. Yet, this degradation of the skin was not visible in any of the photographs.

Given the delicate nature of the skin of this animal. Isn't it more likely than not that the skin issues resulted post mortem from simple degradation due to the natural rotting of a deceased animal? I would be curious to know a few things and if they have already been mentioned, I apologize for asking them again.

1. How long after discovery was the animal taken to the vet for the original post mortem and how was it preserved from the point of finding it dead to that first post mortem?

2.) After the first post mortem, how was the animal preserved and how long was it in transit,(roughly) to the lab for final analysis?

I would seem to me that if the animal died in the night and sat in that wet warm environment overnight, significant deterioration would occur and invasive bacteria would have had a field day.


Regardless of the answers requested above, the simple fact is that Ed has met his guaranty and is not at fault in this instance.
 
K412 said:
I agree completely. I did treat my frogs as a preventative measure because chytrid is so wide spread among wc and cb amphibians. They never had any signs of illness but since it needs stress or filthy living conditions to overcome the frog. I have an evacuation kit for both of my horned frogs and if ever they were to be stressed it would be from being in a breeder box and out of their normal surroundings!
From what I recall once treated the chances of them having or getting it is slim to none I don't want to chance it.


Thanks. The reason I asked was to rule out any cross contamination from other frog in your collection.
 
deborahbroadus said:
The reference could be wrong, in fact all the references that I found could be outdated, but I still continue to doubt that a frog could die in 24 hours from being handled a couple of times and having his/her picture taken even if she did wave some tongs in its face. Lack of concrete information on both sides is an issue.


The frog looks healthy to me in the photo. As for doubt about frogs dieing in 24 hours from stress? yes it CAN happen - usually in the more delicate species though. I lost a RETF to stress by simply moving it to a little bit larger enclosure as it had outgrown the current. I went to a great deal of trouble to make sure it was set up exactly the same way as the smaller container had been, but the frog still stressed from the move and was dead in 36 hours. A whites (unlike a RETF) is considered to be pretty damn hardy though. But still, that poor frog seems to have gone through a lot more stressful stimuli than it should have after arriving at his new home.
 
Mr. Schmitt- I put the crickets into the terrarrium and returned 30-45 minutes later and found her deceased. I took the picture of her remains and put her into the refrigerator. I took her to my vet the next day.
Mr. Curtin- I do not know the method of shipping but I know that her remains were sent preserved in formalin for the transit to the Pathologist.
I do not know with certainty that he had knowledge that she was ill.

I am not concerned that this frog contaminated my existing frogs. All supplies for each of my frogs are purchased sererately. They of course share a food supply but their food is prepared seperatly and fed with their own tongs.
The supplies for the whites were purchased seperately as well and I always wash my hands when feeding or cleaning one frog to the next.
I do have a mister that I use for both of them but nothing touches it and it is cleaned between uses.
 
The shipping reference was in relation to what the frog went through on her way to you from Ed, and the possibility of that contributing to its death.

As for contamination, after I saw you mention treating your other frogs, I wondered if they had been in previous contact w/ Chytrid Fungus, which they could have passed to the White's. Glad to see you do everything in your power to prevent cross contamination and that your frogs had not previously been exposed.
 
I feel compelled to say that while I resent the comments made about my possible abuse or neglect of this animal I understand them. No one knows me well enough to judge me and can only go by what they have read and what Ed claims to be true.
Although it has no bearing here I would like to add some information as far as my character and personal history are concerned.
I am very factitious about husbandry, doing my research and taking the best possible care of my pets.
I worked as a Veterinary Technician from 4/10/2000 to 5/5/2006. I am well versed in the necessary requirements for post mortem studies and their time constraints. While the Clinic at which I was employed did not see exotic animals one of my best friends is a Technician at the Clinic where I took her remains.
As far as the comments made that I intentionally killed this frog I take it as a very personal insult it bothers me a great deal, perhaps even more so than Ed making a profit off of an animals death. I am an Animal Cruelty Investigator and part of the training that I have had does involve reptiles. That is where my fascination began. While I currently own only a few, 2 horned frogs and a corn snake I am not just someone who thinks Oh this is a cool animal, I want it and I will just throw it in a tank and if it dies I will just get a new one.
As I stated at the start of this post my history has no bearing on this case except for the following;
I would never intentionally harm an animal, I make sure the people who do go to jail for it.
My integrity and reputation as a Law Enforcement Officer is all that I have. I work hard to make sure that it stays intact.
I understand that the OP and the broker are both under fire in these circumstances. Since obviously plenty of people here "know" Ed no one here knows me.
I would be very appreciative if from this point on I would not be accused of such a heinous crime as killing or intentionally injuring an animal.
That is the only reason that I wanted to add this information.
 
Mr. Curtain- while I was researching frogs and elected to go with horned frogs I read a very informative thread on fatfrogs by Steven Busch. It is known that even CB amphibians are carriers of this fungus and while they remain asymptomatic when under stress the fungus is quickly fatal.
Thank you for your comment.
 
K412 said:
even CB amphibians are carriers of this fungus and while they remain asymptomatic when under stress the fungus is quickly fatal.
Thank you for your comment.

By that logic, it is then reasonable that Ed may have had no way of knowing there was anything wrong with that frog...even if it tests positive for Chytrid Fungus.

Again, this doesn't absolve Ed for ignoring you.
 
K412 said:
Mr. Schmitt- I put the crickets into the terrarrium and returned 30-45 minutes later and found her deceased. I took the picture of her remains and put her into the refrigerator. I took her to my vet the next day.
Mr. Curtin- I do not know the method of shipping but I know that her remains were sent preserved in formalin for the transit to the Pathologist.
I do not know with certainty that he had knowledge that she was ill.

Thanks you for the response. I did a little quick research on Formalin. The quote below is interesting.

While formaldehyde is a potent disinfectant and anti-bacterial agent, it is essentially ineffective as a fungicide, insecticide, or larvacide. This is an important point to remember when considering formalin in the treatment of fish. While formalin will work for such problems as gill flukes, surface infections, and other parasites, it will NOT work on argulus, fish lice, and other macro-parasites that we associate with treatments requiring organophosphates, such as dimlin. Nor will formalin be effective against mold and fungus-related problems, such as saprolegnia.

But before you go thinking formalin is an ideal anti-bacterial treatment, first consider how formaldehyde “kills.” Unlike most anti-bacterial and germicidal agents which poison the bacteria and germ cells, formaldehyde kills cell tissue by dehydrating the tissue and bacteria cells and replacing the normal fluid in the cells with a gel-like rigid compound. The latter effect exhibits the coagulation properties of formaldehyde. Tissue and bacterium cells are made of protoplasm and as such, contain large amounts of moisture. The introduction of formaldehyde into the tissue dries out the protoplasm and destroys the cell. In terms of embalming practices, this is a perfect situation as the formaldehyde not only disinfects the tissue but replaces the tissue cell moisture with a rigid gel thus allowing the embalmed tissue to maintain its contour. Additionally, the “new” cell structure will resist further bacterial attacks as its composition now contains a formaldehyde-based compound. So, while the usual list of anti-bacterial agents, such as tetracycline, amikacin, baytril, and the like poison their respective bacterial enemies and are then flushed from the system by the kidneys and liver, formalin is retained in the now altered tissue structures of the living organism.

Two questions from a lay person that may be completely wrong

1. If the remains were preserved in Formalin and then shipped, how could the remains then exhibit live bacteria especially to the level in the report?

2.) Could the cell damaging characteristics of Formalin shown abobove in bold have been the cause or the contibuting cause to the skin degaradation?

Both of the above are questions for btter trained individuals...not statements

To the OP. I don't think anyone really thinks you did anything intentionally to this animal. You sound like someone who genuinely cares about her pets and really researched this acquisition prior to purchase. That said, the animal looks healthy in your pics, arrived alive and survived for several hours without much in the way of symptomology. My unsolicited opinion is that the animal died and no one really knows why.

This is one to chalk up to "crap happens" and let it go Kelly. I don't think there is any blame to anyone on this transaction
 
Back
Top