• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Fauna, the BOI, and Favouritism...

First off, I think my point has been made...I don't think I was really trying to do so much of "finger pointing" as of attempting to make a discussion of something I perceived...maybe right, maybe wrongly...

Some of the responses were dismaying though...I was bummed that Webslave seemed to take it as a personal attack, and I was horrified at what Robin did....waaaaaaay out of line. Karen H. has stuck her 2c's in a number of times at odd junctures, as well as David and Dan.

I don't really take the reptile business personally...business is business...so I guess that making personal "slams" to me is rather silly and counter-productive. This whole thing came about because I saw an apparent gathering of the flock around a few carcasses that had not been proven right or wrong over the past few months, and it caused some concern.

Having always tried, and not always successfully, to be fair in my judgements...I was just asking how all of you felt.


Answers in spades.

greg
 
WebSlave said:
Well excuse me for not naming names, but I will give you some general guidelines about people who feel there is favoritism being exercised here.

  • Anyone who comes to a moderator or myself saying that someone should get warning points for something, and we disagree, feels we are exhibiting favoritism.
  • Anyone who sees us assessing warning points on someone they feel should NOT have gotten the points, feels we are exercising favoritism against the other person.
  • Anyone seeing something posted that neither myself nor the moderators have even seen yet, and correspondingly have not acted on it, will accuse us of favoritism.
  • Anyone who comes to me and demands that I accept their side of the story on face value, and I do not, will accuse me of favoritism.
  • Anyone who comes to me complaining about someone else, and I decline to get in the middle, thinking to myself that they are BOTH acting like juveniles, will believe I am exhibiting favoritism. Normally I get this from BOTH sides.

There are probably more, but that will suffice as a starter.

For the record, I REALLY don't care at all about the personal squabbles. I won't chose sides, simply because I have no interest in either side. There can BE NO favoritism, because generally speaking, none of the combatants can possibly be a "favorite" of mine.

If my own mother came on here and posted out of line, I would give her warning points if I read her posts.

If someone whom I hated with a passion posted here, deserving warning points, and I never read any of those words, I would not assess warning points, because I COULD NOT.

That's just the way it is.

Rich, just in case you think I was referring to you, I wasn't. I do NOT always agree with you or your mods and have said so, without whining, at least I hope I came off as NOT whining, a few times. I do NOT think you play favorites, you're pretty good at staying out of things.

I am primarliy interested in who Greg thinks is playing favorites and secondly anyone elses thoughts on it. This does NOT mean I am not interested in YOUR opinion, but I do NOT expect to see it expressed here just because you don't, as far as I am concerned, play favorites.
 
cthulhu77 said:
First off, I think my point has been made...I don't think I was really trying to do so much of "finger pointing" as of attempting to make a discussion of something I perceived...maybe right, maybe wrongly...

Some of the responses were dismaying though...I was bummed that Webslave seemed to take it as a personal attack, and I was horrified at what Robin did....waaaaaaay out of line. Karen H. has stuck her 2c's in a number of times at odd junctures, as well as David and Dan.

I don't really take the reptile business personally...business is business...so I guess that making personal "slams" to me is rather silly and counter-productive. This whole thing came about because I saw an apparent gathering of the flock around a few carcasses that had not been proven right or wrong over the past few months, and it caused some concern.

Having always tried, and not always successfully, to be fair in my judgements...I was just asking how all of you felt.


Answers in spades.

greg

I did not see your question in that light at all.

Puts it in a whole new focus. As is evidenced by my post above.

Sorry Greg, thought you were axe grinding.
 
Not axe grinding at all...I respect the boi quite a lot...but...
there has been some "jumping on the wagon" going on, as far as I can see...and maybe that is coloured by my own spectacles...

Unhappy about some of the responses, but happy with others (oh yeah, you have to use a yoda voice here) we are...

greg
 
WebSlave said:
Well excuse me for not naming names, but I will give you some general guidelines about people who feel there is favoritism being exercised here.

  • Anyone who comes to a moderator or myself saying that someone should get warning points for something, and we disagree, feels we are exhibiting favoritism.
  • Anyone who sees us assessing warning points on someone they feel should NOT have gotten the points, feels we are exercising favoritism against the other person.
  • Anyone seeing something posted that neither myself nor the moderators have even seen yet, and correspondingly have not acted on it, will accuse us of favoritism.
  • Anyone who comes to me and demands that I accept their side of the story on face value, and I do not, will accuse me of favoritism.
  • Anyone who comes to me complaining about someone else, and I decline to get in the middle, thinking to myself that they are BOTH acting like juveniles, will believe I am exhibiting favoritism. Normally I get this from BOTH sides.

There are probably more, but that will suffice as a starter.

For the record, I REALLY don't care at all about the personal squabbles. I won't chose sides, simply because I have no interest in either side. There can BE NO favoritism, because generally speaking, none of the combatants can possibly be a "favorite" of mine.

If my own mother came on here and posted out of line, I would give her warning points if I read her posts.

If someone whom I hated with a passion posted here, deserving warning points, and I never read any of those words, I would not assess warning points, because I COULD NOT.

That's just the way it is.

Damn, too much to worry about.....

Just do what I do on my fish board, ban everyone that annoys you. You have barely enough free time to keep the board going, no sense wasting that time worrying about who thinks they are getting shafted. If they don't like what you have to say ban them and let them go to another site that won't "play favortes."

I'll give you an example-
A guy posted this pic with the following comment:
post-1321-1115420544.jpg

"Some people on this site questioned me keeping my iguana and my boa together. Look at them now. "

After a few doubting comments this:
"Well actually the grey head is the sign of a recovered 4 year old iguana who I have nersed back from terrible bone desiese and a severly burt head. The snake and iguana are completely comfortable together. If they were not why would the small helpless lizard sleep in the coils of it's hated enemy? In a converted walk in closet with so much room and places to hide. The snake is well fed and has been since I rescued her from the basement of some womans house 2 years ago. It seems to me that in all the experince in animal nature flowing through these opinionated pages that some one could realize that maybe, just maybe life finds a way to find the companionship that all living things need. I appreciate everyones positive feed back but I have begun to question why I have chosen to take my time to share the beauty of my animals with you. I have spent my entire life surrounded by animals. Surrounded by my equals. I realize every day why all the animals that have come to me have. Becouse there are just a few of us in this world who can allow ourselves to be not seperated from the rest of nature. Why is it ok to prejudge every animal situation but not ok to prejudge every human one? When I began serching for information on this great invention of mans I thought I had come across something special in these pages. One guy even told me to not feed my cat fish live feeders as to not ruin the bond between me and the animal from daily feedings. I have posted pictures of my tanks with the response of "How do you keep them from killing each other?". The same way I keep my boa from eating my iguana. By trusting in the fact that I know my friends. I know why they can co exist in the same space because if it were not for that space both would not have survived. So for your sake and your animals please learn to trust your fellow beings and not prejudge. "

Also this later on:
"I guess telling everyone that there is a six and half foot Rock python that lives with them both would get alot of "positive" feed back as well!!!"

Well after deleting the thread I warned him sternly to never post it again, last thing I need is a herd of newbs thinking it will work for them. He sent back a comment that he didn't like me editing it and was promptly banned.

His comment:
"I am glad to see you follow your own rules. **** off and may the gods have mersy upon your dear frail soul in the near future. So much for freedom of speach . Eat **** and die you worthless excuse for a life. "

I basically told him that freedom of speech doesn't apply on a privately owned website and told him to find another place to post pics of his improper husbandry....hopefully he doesn't find this site.
 
Earlier in this post I said I saw favorites. After going back and reading and reading and reading I have to say my position has changed slightly. I think what people may be seeing is not so much favoritism but groups traveling together and posting similar opinions against or for an other member. I hope that makes sense...........

Case in point Lucille. I feel she gets harped on a lot for simple enthusiasm. Many people feel she kisses Rich's ass. I personally think she has more loyalty to the site than to Rich. In a way I think she looks at Rich as her boss. And for all intents and purposes what's wrong with that? Lucille if I am wrong please let me know.

Wes has a following of many members and at times it seems people kiss his ass. Favoritism??? Could be, but all in all I think it's just the way he is. He's funny as hell and does not mince words. I even find myself at times specifically searching out his posts so I can get a good laugh. Am I showing favoritism??? I don't really think so, but even if I am it's harmless in my opinion.

Robin too has a little group of minions that follow her around. Nothing wrong with that. I suppose it must be her magnetic personality!?!?!?!? lol

I myself have my favorite members that I read just because they are who they are. Does that make me an ass kisser?

There I named names, not much to it. take it as you will.
 
cthulhu77 said:
I guess that making personal "slams" to me is rather silly and counter-productive.

Yet here are a few of your own quotes:

cthulhu77 said:
I guess this guy must be REAL special...Short bus rider.

cthulhu77 said:
speaking of maturity levels, yours is about as bargain-basement as I have ever had the misfortune of running across...You sure seem to spend a lot of time being "pissed off"...doesn't that get boring?

Here is one of Greg's fisrt posts. A far cry from where he is now.

cthulhu77 said:
I am glad I found you all, never had joined up before, but I sure like what I see !!! Hats off to whoever is running this site...very nice!

Answers in spades. :rofl:
 
LOL...venues do change, don't they ??

Not really a far cry to me...still feel the same way about the site. But, I am not going to sit by without making some noise while some go too far down a path that is unfair.

Am I always correct? Where the hell did I say that? Have I made mistakes, typos, etc??? Tons. (which are usually caught by dand or one of his buddies...which is cool, it keeps me honest) I am not trying to come off like King of the hill here...just a regular serf like the rest of you.

greg
 
Dennis wrote"

"Complain about it, then you do the same. I can't wait to you start flaming as well! lol. "

The differance here is that I hit you because you Blatantly lied about what I said in a previous post to make your point. This may have been due to your inability to remember clearly what was said, but then you should have taken the time to look it up.

I didn't lie, I just posted opinions that people didn't "agree" with.

Shawn
 
Zx7trev said:
Dennis wrote"

"Complain about it, then you do the same. I can't wait to you start flaming as well! lol. "

The differance here is that I hit you because you Blatantly lied about what I said in a previous post to make your point. This may have been due to your inability to remember clearly what was said, but then you should have taken the time to look it up.

I didn't lie, I just posted opinions that people didn't "agree" with.

Shawn

LoL
I blandly lied? I posted what you said. I also posted why I stated what I did. Did you miss the post?

You took the position in this thread that everyone jumps on people for little things such as simple packaging difference. I merely pointed out you left out some detail to that post, which included shipping through the post office.
 
Lets go over this again shall we Dennis?

You said:

"Sorry you feel we should have bowed to you for thinking illegally shipping Snakes through the post office is just dandy"

I never said that. In fact, here is the first line from my first post in the thread that we are talking about in regards to shipping something USPS:

"Now...XXXXX... you did break the law shipping USPS. That CAN be used against us as a herp community, and you should probably rethink that method."...Shawn

I think I am clearly saying that I don't condone it. I am just not being a dick about it. So, you are CLEARLY misrepresenting what I said to make your point. This is what we call a lie. Again, I honestly think maybe you just don't remember that post clearly, and made a mistake. Still, it was wrong, and you should have looked it up if you were going to use it.

I left you negative feedback because you didn't, and in effect, lied. You warned me, and so did others, because my opinions were not popular. THATS the point I am making. Someone said earlier that you were preaching to the chior? Well, the chior are the little clique here that believe everything they read, without using their brains to come up with there own opinions. Shall we keep going Dennis, or can you just admit that you made a mistake?

Shawn
 
And please don't attack my grammer when you run out of facts. You clearly need to reread your posts before you submit them as well. Just prior to you making fun of a mispelling of mine, you wrote:

""Complain about it, then you do the same. I can't wait to you start flaming as well! lol. "...Dennis

That should be until, not to, genius.

S~
 
Here is what I am getting at, and my situation is a good example. A while ago, in this thread, Dennis, through mistake or not, misrepresented my position on something to make himself seem insightful and clever. It was in fact, not a true statement, but, he is well accepted here. As such, Karen chimed in as well, calling me, I think, a dumbass? ( I am sure a few other folks didn't post, but had the same mindset at this point) Well, karen admitted later in this thread that she was just jumping on the bandwagon.

This is a prime example of what happens here. Someone who is respected can post nearly anything, and its believed, even if its wrong, and its up to the accused to convince EVERYONE that they are right. If people can't, or won't, you guys do a fair job of tearing up their reputation, even if its just to the members of this site. You all have gone from trying to be a service that we can all use, to a "say whatever needs to be said to win the arguement" type of club here. Its a real shame.

S~
 
You know, if you weren't such a crybaby, such a whiney-grates-on-the-nerves sort of person, you could simply come here, post your quote, prove your point and MOVE ON.

But NOOOOOOOOOO, you need to whine and bitch and moan about how poorly YOU'VE been treated. If you dislike it so well, STOP coming here. Either that or just suck it up and move on. It's your ATTITUDE that is getting you such derision.

And yes, I did just give you negative points for being such a crybaby.
 
Zx7trev said:
Someone who is respected can post nearly anything, and its believed, even if its wrong, and its up to the accused to convince EVERYONE that they are right.


Aliens are attacking. Run for your lives! :bolt01:
 
Back
Top