Ed Clark
New member
Off Topic Sam, But I hear ya!
Gecko_Den said:What about inappropriate touching?
![]()
Gecko_Den said:What about inappropriate touching?
![]()
BallBoutique said:I purchased and sold from Wes Harris and Joe Capone under their new business names.
Wes Harris Reptiles and Power House Reptiles. I hope you can tell who owns what.
Does this make me partners with the above breeders? Dah!
Now "Lets twist again like we did last year." Chubby Checkers........![]()
I realize that you will try and twist this too. BTW Mojo is good at this.....right MauledSparky?
BTW all were quality animals.
Thanks,
Rick Denmon
President of Ball Boutique, Inc.
Clay Davenport said:This thread is moving almost faster than I can read it and I feel like I'm posting off topic now by referring to something about Rick from 20 pages ago...
Anyway, something I see about the "partnership" issue with Joe that Rick is trying so hard to avoid discussing.
Rick is using a technicality in definition to continue to deny they are partners while at the same time he refuses to admit to what degree they are working together. Whether you file joint taxes is largely irrelevant since we all know there are partnerships that do not fall under the legal definition of the term.
For instance let's say I and one of the other posters here (not Rick or Joe) go in together to buy a few of a high dollar morph for breeding purposes. We will not be filing joint tax returns, but we are partners on that project none the less.
If you buy some snakes from someone else to resell once in a while, then you are just buying from someone. If however you have a standing arrangement to buy from a given breeder routinely for the purpose of resell then you are no longer merely buying from someone you are now a business associate at the very least. While I still wouldn't label that a partnership exactly, the effect is essentially the same. Even though you are not invested in their breeding operation and have nothing to do with the breeding animals you have a standing business relationship with that person to broker their animals on a regular basis and in this case apparently a large scale.
So the question, which at this point no longer even needs to be asked, is not whether Rick is partnered with Joe, but to what extent does he maintain a business relationship with him? I think it's obvious to all whether Rick will offer full disclosure or not, that he is brokering heavily if not exclusively for Joe Capone.
It just bugs me when someone constantly tries to use semantics to justify what would be considered by the majority to be seedy practices.
No matter how you attempt to define it, Rick is providing a means for Joe Capone to continue in this business. It's also unlikely that he is the only one, just the first to be discovered. Whether or not to approve of that and whether you send him any business or not is a decision for everyone to make on their own.
Either way I'm willing to bet there's at least a couple more people following this thread in the exact same position as Rick wondering if they will be the next to be led to the gallows.
BallBoutique said:The big list of purchases
I purchased from Ralph Davis.....
I have also purchased and sold animals from Ian G.......too [ED]!
And the same for Dave & Tracy Barker!
I certainly hope it's the last time you are going to say it. The same old sidestep is sure getting old.BallBoutique said:Now this is the last time I am going to say this......
I purchased and sold from Wes Harris and Joe Capone under their new business names.
Wes Harris Reptiles and Power House Reptiles. I hope you can tell who owns what.
Does this make me partners with the above breeders? Dah!
Clay Davenport said:Ah, that's enough, it's a waste of time and bandwidth anyway.
If it good enough for Dave and Tracy to do trades and do breeding loans than it sure is ok for me to purchase animals from them. That is the way I see it! Some on the big list are mine and some are Joe's.
FATASS said:I guess that about sums it up.
hhmoore said:Before you bark too loudly at FATASS, remember that he started this thread in FEB 2004

BallBoutique said:Not barking at all.
Just wanted to hear his motives.....
Yes I waited along time but Fatty and I both know he was fishing for dirt. He never replied to the positive post now did he?![]()
Mooing Tricycle said:this is the only constructive post i will make in this thread. Ive got very little to add to it. BUT.
Dont try to turn this thread around on someone else. This thread is about you. If you have proof of another person having shady business dealings such as yourself then, by all means, Post the proof in a NEW thread under that persons name. and be ready to fight with the dogs. Otherwise, i think you should be replying to the questions that people have asked you. Lying, rather, avoiding the truth will only make you look worse....

Jim O said:I'm not defending Rick, but it would not speak well of Ralph if he sent an underling here to stir things up rather than do it himself.
Jim O said:I must admit that I also am curious as to why one of Ralph's employees on here making an inquiry.
FATASS, perhaps an explanation of your motivation would be in order. If you were not working for Ralph back in 2004 that's one thing, but if you were, that is different.
I'm not defending Rick, but it would not speak well of Ralph if he sent an underling here to stir things up rather than do it himself.
BallBoutique said:Mojo follows me from forum to forum. Same with Jassballs.
Always trying to put my business down. Or making false acquisitions about me.
Cat_72 said:Keeping in mind that the original post was in 2004 here.....
If Ralph is "trying to find dirt" on Rick, and it bothers him so...why does Rick brag that Joey got Ralph a great deal on a new Viper?
It just don't add up.![]()
And though I don't know this "mojo" person, I do know that John has been a posting member here for quite awhile, unlike Rick...so how does that make John following Rick?
And for the record, I am not nor ever have I been a member of the RDR forums.
And I'm curious, what "false accusations" have been made here?
I understand that Cathy, but also keep in mind that questions regarding the motivation of the OP are legitimate in any BOI thread. There's no statute of limitations on that. The fact that FATASS, an employee and longtime buddy of Ralph's, was inquiring about Rick makes little sense unless it was for somewhat nefarious reasons. After all, if FATASS wanted a BP he'd probably get it from Ralph or have Ralph get it for him, seeing as they have apparently a close relationship and Ralph's collection dwarf's Rick's by anyone's calculations. Clearly FATASS was not intending to do business with Rick, so what was his purpose? The fact that FATASS made the post in 2004 and only returned when things heated up in 2007 adds more suspicion. Again, as Rick pointed out, three posts on Fauna, three on this thread, one in 2004 and two recently.Cat_72 said:Keeping in mind that the original post was in 2004 here.....
Jim O said:I understand that Cathy, but also keep in mind that questions regarding the motivation of the OP are legitimate in any BOI thread. There's no statute of limitations on that. The fact that FATASS, an employee and longtime buddy of Ralph's, was inquiring about Rick makes little sense unless it was for somewhat nefarious reasons. After all, if FATASS wanted a BP he'd probably get it from Ralph or have Ralph get it for him, seeing as they have apparently a close relationship and Ralph's collection dwarf's Rick's by anyone's calculations. Clearly FATASS was not intending to do business with Rick, so what was his purpose? The fact that FATASS made the post in 2004 and only returned when things heated up in 2007 adds more suspicion. Again, as Rick pointed out, three posts on Fauna, three on this thread, one in 2004 and two recently.
I'd say clearly the OP's intent was to stir up dirt. It does not speak well for FATASS or for Ralph.