Rascal certainly was a looker! Truly a beautiful animal. Healthy and fat, not sickly looking or thin. One would never suspect, looking at the photo, that he was in need of vet care.
I also noticed on your site, Nicole, that you've made note not only of the date of his death, but of TKO as the breeder of Rascal. To that end, he has been through at least 3 keepers, none of whom may have suspected illness.
You stated in your original post:
"May came around he began to eat even less which made no sense to me at the end of the month he suddenly could no longer move or would even eat so I rushed him into the vet for testing."
Your euthanasia report is dated April 28. May comes after April. Did you mean March?
You also stated in your original post:
"Upon X-rays the vet found tumors on his spine he stated that for something this involved this dragon was like this for over a year and probably was always lethargic like this during that time. I told him about the price I paid he stated with the color and quality of the animal it was most likely the seller knew something was wrong and wanted to move the dragon and make some money while she could."
Basically, that's heresay. Your vet is qualified to diagnose, but not to speculate motive or what someone "most likely" should have known.
You've presented a report of euthanasia (with the Doctor's name misspelled no less!); you've presented no vet exam to prove tumors (although I am not doubting your claim). Additionally, as pointed out, you saw two different vets before Rascal was diagnosed, yet you still think somehow Jeane should have magically known about his condition when even a licensed, qualified vet did not. Odd.
I also saw a previous post where you claimed Jeane bought dragons from a breeder you know and never paid him for them. Again, more hearsay (but again, I don't doubt that). However, knowing that you still bought from her? Odd.
Unfortunately, I have to agree with the majority that after nearly 6 months, the seller is not obligated to reimburse you. That does not mean I would ever make a purchase from Jeane, I would not. Not ever.
I am fully aware of her association with Wendy, her Rankin "problem", her less-than-stellar business practices and shady deals.
*************************************************************************
Is it not possible that on a purchase you made in November of 2007, you might be mistaken about when you actually first contacted the vendor with any concerns? Did you type and send this email to the vendor?
Jim, with all due respect, that email of 6-18 proves nothing. The very wording in the opening sentence,
"I will just repost in the guest book every day Until you contact me" simply does not sound like a first-time notification. It sounds more like someone who
has attempted to open communication and received none in return.
I believe Nicole probably did try to contact Jeane. I also believe Jeane probably did not respond. Hell, she's not responding now, despite every poster agreeing she owes Nicole nothing. You are her conduit.
~ Laura Bolt