• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Jeff and Christina Wise (Wise Reptiles) Stole Money from Benefit Auctions for Maggie

Isn't the fat content of the brain somewhere around 60 -70 %. I can see how she could be confused as the "brains" of the operation.

:rofl::rofl:I had a good laugh at her pathetic attempt at a threat. Does she forget what she wrote or two lazy to go back and reread before she opens her *** mouth or starts moving those stubby little fingers across the keyboard.

Jeff the spineless jelly fish is getting dumped. Maybe he can start sending some messages so we can see these two con artists go at each other. :dgrin::angry:

It would probably resemble Ed and Nicole :ack2:
 
Wow... you should be thinking more about paying maggie back and not where to place the blame for YOUR hog like GREED! I would imagine the only reason you even care about any of this being online is we are effectively hitting you where it hurts... YOUR WALLET! What have we raised too many eyebrows for you two to scam good people out of THEIR charitable contributions???
 
I know that Kevin posted a couple of Youtube videos. Has anyone else posted any? I think the more of those that get posted the better. Especially if as many people as possible are posting them. They will get more attention that way. If there has been more posted, where are they? I think these videos are a good thing.

Things have been crazy around here.. but I am working on an updated version. I dont have to spend both of my off days this week working on a vehicle so I hope to have it done by Thursday. :thumbsup:
 
Her wallet must be hurting if she is threatening to sue. i bet she wants money out of it. i also believe she is not leaving her anchor but just changing her name to make it easier for her. however she at least knows that if any of us finds out what her new name is it will be all over this thread and will only be pushed back up to the top.

this is great webslave, i needed a laugh today. please do keep us updated it would be great to see which fast talking slow witted family member they try to get to play a lawyer. it also seems like the only non factual thing the thread holds is she is no longer mrs wise.
 
Her wallet must be hurting if she is threatening to sue. i bet she wants money out of it. i also believe she is not leaving her anchor but just changing her name to make it easier for her. however she at least knows that if any of us finds out what her new name is it will be all over this thread and will only be pushed back up to the top.

this is great webslave, i needed a laugh today. please do keep us updated it would be great to see which fast talking slow witted family member they try to get to play a lawyer. it also seems like the only non factual thing the thread holds is she is no longer mrs wise.

She was only Wise as far as her last name goes. Everything else she was just stooopid. Of course criminals normally are and they get caught. :rofl:
 
Personally, I can't believe that she thinks for even an instant that I really believe she wants to go before a judge and have this all brought before a courtroom. :rofl:
 
Not to be a buzz kill or anything, but I was under the impression that libel, or slander, or something along that line, was specifically for situations where someone with a "podium" was able to attack a person, but that person could not defend themselves in like fashion?

If that is the case, Fauna may be at risk, since the account is blocked and she can't respond to any of the attacks, many of them personal, that have been put here.

I am not saying she does not deserve the beating she is getting here, but that doesn't mean squat in the court system.

Wouldn't mind hearing from a real lawyer on this? It kind of sounds like her lawyer told her as long as she has no voice here, she has a case. Rich kind of stepped into that, if I am not wrong.
 
Where I am coming from with that post is not long ago I heard a "lawyer" on a radio show talking about internet discussion boards, and people who threaten libel in order to win a debate. The "lawyer" said as long as that person can post in defense of themselves in that thread, there is no libel, it is only if they are unable to respond that they have a case.
 
Where I am coming from with that post is not long ago I heard a "lawyer" on a radio show talking about internet discussion boards, and people who threaten libel in order to win a debate. The "lawyer" said as long as that person can post in defense of themselves in that thread, there is no libel, it is only if they are unable to respond that they have a case.

This is my understanding that I found on a site that put it in better words than I can. I would love to see her prove any of what said is false. Incuding any comments on her weight etc. Only lies here are from her mouth.

From - http://www.netslander.com/ -
What is ‘libel’?

Libel is a written defamation. Generally, radio and television broadcasts that are defamatory are considered to be libel, rather than slander.
Can I sue someone who says or writes something defamatory about me?

In order to prove defamation, you have to be able to prove that what was said or written about you was false. If the information is true, or if you consented to publication of the material, you will not have a case. However, you may bring an defamatory action if the comments are so reprehensible and false that they effect your reputation in the community or cast aspersions on you.
 
Rich has had more than his share of the "I'll get my lawyer" BS ...I'm sure he knows where he stands on this stuff.
 
Where I am coming from with that post is not long ago I heard a "lawyer" on a radio show talking about internet discussion boards, and people who threaten libel in order to win a debate. The "lawyer" said as long as that person can post in defense of themselves in that thread, there is no libel, it is only if they are unable to respond that they have a case.

My understanding is that if it is true there is no libel. I don't see anything wrong with (and I doubt a court would) not allowing someone to come on and "defend" herself against truth. If it was false information, and she was not granted the opportunity, then perhaps there would be a libel case.
 
I know it is only Wikipedia BUT:
Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. It is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).
The word usually in there can go in a lot of different directions...

Here is another rather ambiguous statement:
Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. "Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[4][not verified in body]

Posting things like where they go to church might fall under this?

BTW this is all from Wikipedia like I said, so not concrete law but perhaps something to think about.

I can certainly think of more frivolous lawsuits that ended poorly...
 
sorry for multiple posts, I want to say that Bob Corn-Revere was the lawyer I heard mention this, on a podcast of the old Penn Jillette show. He is a First Amendment attorney.

Again, don't know if this is true, varies by state, a concern, whatever. I would hate to see the subject find a way to hurt anyone else though...and onyl putting this out there for public consumption...
 
It is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).

I think this is the part that should be in bold.

It is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).
 
Usually in general means not all the time. And I could make a case that the majority of this thread is about, but not to the Wise family.

I'm just sayin....
 
Personally, I can't believe that she thinks for even an instant that I really believe she wants to go before a judge and have this all brought before a courtroom. :rofl:

Yeah, I think this is the funniest part of it all. A courtroom is the last place she/he/they want to be. Besides that, I really can't see any lawyer even representing them in this anyway.

The sad thing is that they are continuing to lie, to try and weasel out of what they did. If they would just do the right thing and pay back the money, maybe some people would take down the things they posted about these two. I think all of us want to see the money go to where it belongs, plain and simple. And that is also the most important part of all of this.

What these two did was cold hearted, ruthless, inhumane, cruel, merciless, unimaginable to the rest of us, and so low, that it makes them a disgrace to the human race.

How people could do that to two families in their time of need is just unexcusable. One family lost a husband, and a father. The other family lost a child. They showed all of us the depths of evil, when we were trying to help these two families when they really needed help the most. So we need to show these two, that we will never forget what they did. Until they pay the money that is owed, we should all use the resources we have available to tell the world what they did, and also warn others of what these two are capable of.

When the money is paid back, then we can believe they are sorry for their actions. Until then, I don't think we should even pay attention to anything they say. Actions speak louder than words, and every word out of their mouths has been one lie after the another.

Jeff, and Christina, we all know you are reading this. I'm sure it will all stop if you would do what's right, and pay back the money. You two are going to end up paying a huge price for such a small amount of money. Live and learn, I guess.
 
Jeff, and Christina, we all know you are reading this. I'm sure it will all stop if you would do what's right, and pay back the money. You two are going to end up paying a huge price for such a small amount of money. Live and learn, I guess.

A very huge price. Dave, Myself, & a few others wont stop till either your behind bars or you pay back the money you stole from Maggie & Rick.
 
Back
Top