• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Jungle Habitats: Alan Hall, the rest of the story

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please pay close attention to the Webslaves own reservations about how appropriate some of the postings of one of the moderators is, and the perception it could leave with other members of this site.

If you look at the times involved, Jay made his post, about an hour (little over) later Rich noted that it might be a little iffy and twenty minutes (All numbers rounded to convenience) after that Jay announced that it had already been edited to remove the offensive material. While it may have been a ninety minute lapse in potential judgement (Really, is "crybaby" against the spirit of the TOS?) it was not viewed by many IF any (given the time of day) outside of the moderation team and none of them chose to comment on it in the thread itself if anyone did. The only actual insults (so SO mild... I really have called people far worse for far FAR less) were in a thread in a forum Alan was not supposed to be able to view.

And yes... Alan acted out of anger and frustration at a few situations that didn't got he way he wanted them to but I don't really see this as an excuse. If the BOI has taught us (a collective us) anything, it's that the true worth of a person is not known UNTIL they have a problem or are faced with a frustrating situation. People who are good guys for years without incident shouldn't be excused when they turn into bad guys the first time a chance presents itself.
 
Mr. Haley,
Point taken, and I truly understand where you are coming from. I was attempting to answer the question you posed where was anything that could be perceived as a wrong commited by the moderation team of Fauna. Personally, I am in agreement with your observation that the conversation was not that bad, but then again some people have thinner skin than others.


Best regards,

Carson Grindstaff
 
You know...it's really a shame. It's amazing what can happen when people see $$ signs. I've seen it happen enough to know. Alan...you've been a member here for quite some time, posting to the "horrors" of people's experiences...bashing those that have done wrong, acting almost as a higher power looking down on people. And all along you've been using this "secret window" of knowledge to change things...only for the sole purpose of you gaining something from it. I can't say it shocks me completely...just opens the door up to show people how greedy you really are and how you will step on anyone you can to help you reach the top.
 
To alison and Sal

Well first this came to light this month hasent been a ongoing thing , secondly if you check my record i have NEVER stole , lied,made up stories,said it was shipped when it wasnt had to have someone else answer questions posed for me and stolen thousands of dollars from people and sent out sick dying animals and then have the balls to act like it wasnt anything wrong with it and then lie about paying them back? ill let you smoke on that have a good night
 
Ummm....NOT alison and sal.....have you even read the BOI in the past 7 months?

Anyway...i wasn't necessarily ATTACKING you....just "smoking" on the thought of what you've tried to do. People get so greedy when it comes to money. That's how most bank robbers get caught...they get greedy.
 
For what it's worth.....
Wes is IMHO one of the wisest persons on this board. Go back and re read his post. When I considered it, his point that there are indeed others that have been evil and obnoxious for a long time, and Alan is not comparable, is right.
Alan really blew it, but Wes and Carson are right, we are spinning this out to everyone's detriment.
We do give others the chance to redeem themselves, and as sad as I feel about what happened, perhaps we should back off and see what Alan does with this situation.
I think Rich has the power to ban Alan, and the very fact that Alan has the privilege to continue posting here may mean that Rich sees a possibility of redemption; I think I will wait, and see.....
 
MoonlitMedia said:
Ummm....NOT alison and sal.....have you even read the BOI in the past 7 months?

Anyway...i wasn't necessarily ATTACKING you....just "smoking" on the thought of what you've tried to do. People get so greedy when it comes to money. That's how most bank robbers get caught...they get greedy.

Changing your sign in name from Upchuck Exotics to moonlit media DOES NOT change the fact that you are a lying, conniving, stealing, untrustworthy piece of flotsom, you and your ex sal.

I think you were attacking Alan, after all it is the hyena, you and your husband sal, who attacks NOT the strong and healthy, but the weak and sick, as you TWO have both done here with Alan.

YOU haven't changed, sal hasn't changed. Alan, maybe he has, time will tell. And whether or not he has he is still redeamable as he is in NO WAY the scumbag you and your husband STILL are alison.

You and salito have SEVERAL deals to make good on, don't you? Perhaps you should tend to your own business before you go trashing folks.
 
lucille said:
I don't know anything about Kingscam. But, I am surprised at your post Brian. Would you not be sad if Fauna was gone?
I would.



I would be upset as this site provides a very important service and Rich is kind enough to provide it for free. With the BOI gone all the scam artists would have a field day, this site does keep them in check somewhat. Still some are either too stupid or just don't care what is said about their bad business practices.
 
I may not be very smart, but I can lift heavy things.

Wes why do you try to prove that statement with every post you make??? Do you even know what a "troll" is? Well it is someone that does what you are doing in this thread. Trying to sidetrack the issue with personal attacks on the people posting about the main issue to try and sidetrack it into unrelated attacks on each other. That is what a troll does and what you are doing here and now.

Do you mean to tell me that if Alan made an effort to try to get you thrown into bankruptcy court and have you lose everything you have worked for, you would just say "oh well, he is really not that bad of a guy. He just made one mistake. I forgive him." Are you seriously trying to tell us that??? If someone burns down you house in a temporary fit of anger, that is ok with you???

The whole point of that posted email is answered with the simple question: "Why did Alan Hall call Jeffie about that information and what did Alan hope Jeffie would do with it when he got it?"

What wrong was inflicted on Alan Hall that would justify such an action???

And Wes, as for your question of why I come to this site and what do I contribute, read my threads. Then think about what I have said. Perhaps the answer will come to you in time.
 
Not far to go!

Hey Roger Jolly,

Wuss would have nothing to loose if they burned down his home, he still lives with his uncle in a trailer trash park. Isn't that right wuss? You always come on here and say that people like us never change, well wuss take a look at yourself for a change, you always do the same $hit over and over again. People are sick and tired of listening to the same old stuff. Why don't you get a life and grow up dude, your old enough to get a job, move out of your uncle's and stop muching off him. But NOOOOOOOOO, you got to come on here 24/7 and put your 2 cents in and it's not even worth that.

Sal Tornambene
Boca Reptiles
 
Mr. Jolly,
I can appreciate your desire to inform others of potential problems within the reptile community. It is for the betterment of all. However, I have a few questions that I hope you will find the time to entertain answers to.

What would have been the harm in merely forwarding that email to Rich Z.? Mr. Hall obtained his information due to a mistake. Unless I am mistaken you received that email due to a mistake. At that point in time, all information gleaned was behind the scenes. What would have been the harm in keeping discussion in the realm of privacy, as opposed to posting it for public consumption?

Additionally, I believe your attempts at painting Mr. Pollock as a troll, in regards to this particular thread, are somewhat unfounded. He is just expressing his opinion and his view of how he perceives things are progessing in this thread. Are you possibly threatened that Mr. Pollock is stealing the thunder from your "scoop"? Just curious.

Best regards,

Carson Grindstaff
 
Typical BOI responses. Attempt to kill the messenger. And for what reason??? Alan has admitted he wrote that email so the credibility of the person posting it is not an issue. But certain people still want to deflect attention away from the central issue. Others want to take this as an opportunity to attack yet someone else.

I have said it before and will say it again, sooner or later Rich is going to come to the realization that this BOI is more of a pain then it is worth to him. Wonder who else will be stupid enough to try to pick up where he leaves off??? And many of you will be scratching your head wondering who is to blame, I'll wager.

Rich come down from the ivory tower and tell me truthfully, do you still feel that the BOI is worth the trouble to you??? What has this cost you and what have you personally gotten out of it??? And for what??? This sort of drivel??? Serving people like Alan Hall who then gleefully tries to stab you in the back because you hurt his widdle feelwings??? Put your time into something more useful to yourself and let these people and this industry get what it deserves.
 
Rich come down from the ivory tower and tell me truthfully, do you still feel that the BOI is worth the trouble to you??? What has this cost you and what have you personally gotten out of it??? And for what??? This sort of drivel??? Serving people like Alan Hall who then gleefully tries to stab you in the back because you hurt his widdle feelwings??? Put your time into something more useful to yourself and let these people and this industry get what it deserves.
Gee. It sounds to me like Roger Jolly wants the BOI to go away and used the email from Alan a chance to try and make it happen.
 
Roger.... as much as I'd hate to see this site melt into oblivion, because it DOES shed light on a lot of wrongdoings in this industry.... I couldn't agree with you MORE in the last two threads you posted!!....

I think Rich has been toying with that idea for MONTHS!!.... and rightfully so.... it's costing him too much time and money for trying to help people that keep stabbing him in the back!!....

Neil
 
quote

Typical BOI responses. Attempt to kill the messenger. And for what reason??? Alan has admitted he wrote that email so the credibility of the person posting it is not an issue. But certain people still want to deflect attention away from the central issue. Others want to take this as an opportunity to attack yet someone else.

end quote

Mr. Jolly,
I regret that you feel that there are attempts at killing the messenger in regards to this thread. However, I believe that its fair to question your motivations. You posted the email, Mr. Hall posted his reasons and his motivations for why he did what he did. In response, Rich Z. posted amplifying information, to give all a clear view of what Mr. Hall had read. Thereby showing members of this site his side of the story. What is the harm in questioning your reasons? I am sorry but you opened yourself to this line of questioning by posting that email you received in error. If you did not want to be placed under the microscope, then perhaps you should have just forwarded that email to Rich Z. and allowed him to handle the situation. In all instances there are at least two sides of every story, it just so happens that in this case there is a third side, and to date, it is my belief we have yet to hear that third side..........yours.

Best regards,

Carson Grindstaff
 
If you did not want to be placed under the microscope, then perhaps you should have just forwarded that email to Rich Z. and allowed him to handle the situation.
Mr. Grindstaff,
The email was forwarded by me, to Seamus Haley who in turn forward it to Rich. Rich had the email long before Mr. Jolly, so there was really no reason for him to forward it to Rich. The only question I have is, Who sent the email to Mr. Jolly? Seamus says he didn't, I know I didn't, that leaves Rich and Randy. Why was Mr. Jolly brought into this?
 
with all dues respect .....

Rich Z. posted amplifying information, to give all a clear view of what Mr. Hall had read.

in all due respect that wasnt ALL that was read and wasnt the basis of my actions . That was nothing and wasnt the reason i made the choice i did .I would ask that the admin forum be opened to the PUBLIC to read the reasons and let the majority have a little light shed on it .

And to Roger Jolly ..... tell us more on why you want the BOI gone ?After all seems 90% of your posts that you make here are in more then one way steering to what you stated
Put your time into something more useful to yourself and let these people and this industry get what it deserves.

Look back and you will see until the recent turn of events i have never spoken badly of the BOI and made any statements of its demise it was the contrary so please Jolly elaborate on your feelings for us please .The reptile world does need a place to shed light on the likes of people that do other people wrong by ripping them off not sending paid for products and sick or dying animals ...
 
Roger Jolly said:
Well I'll be doggone. Got some fan mail from some flounders. And here all this time I thought Alan was just being a business man and didn't have any personal grudges against this site. I do believe I hear the boi calling my name on this one, though.

This is jolly the troll's post in hell mentioning that some "flounder", don't you like the way he thinks of you whoever you are, sent him some dirt on Alan.

jolly the troll is one CLASS act don't you think? Or is he just looking to cause trouble for whoever he can wherever he can?

Trolling trolling trolling, keep them doggies trolling, eh jolly?
 
I have to agree with Mr. Carson here.
Mr. Jolly who did you get that e-mail from? I think it would be very interesting to know just who this "flounder" is.
 
Mr. Giltner,
Thank you for providing the information you posted. It shows a time line and of who was in possesion of the email. You also pose two very good questions in your previous post. Thanks again for your insight to this thread.

Mr. Jolly,
I recend my question as to why you did not forward the email to Rich Z. No sense in forwarding an email when one knows that Rich Z. was already in possession of the email, if that was the case, but then that spawns the question of how could you have known Rich Z. was already in possession of said email.


Mr. Hall,
I apologize for generalizing the flow of events in my response to Mr. Jolly. I over simplified things in an attempt to keep my train of thought flowing.

Best regards,

Carson Grindstaff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top