drop this dead pile of [bleep] ..... did i miss something here ????
I believe so.
The point of this forum, The Board of Inquiry, is to weed out bad guys and to pass along to others, just who the bad guys are.
Bad guys and good guys are made by their actions in this hobby/business.
Just because a person makes a bad guy post on a well known bad guy, does not automatically make the person the 'good guy'
Bad guys can be ripped off as well as anyone else can be ripped off.
With what we already know from this thread, is that person 'A' claims to have 6 dead snakes, from a bad guy.
One black mamba and 5 green mambas.
YET, there is only ONE picture, depicting THREE dead green mambas.
With the other informatin that is well known, is that person 'A' deals in venomoids, quite possibly doing some surgeries himself and some obviously done by another garage surgeon, Ritchi Rich (the person in the picture, holding the 'dead' snakes.).
I do not feel that any refund is due, period, without pictures of ALL the dead animals, along with close ups of all their heads and open mouths.
NOONE in their right mind would consider giving a refund on dead animals, without pictures or bodies of ALL the dead animals, not even KY.
Knowing just what the snakes were heading for (now that we can see they were obviously heading for the knife) O'anus has to provide the burden of proof of just HOW they all died.
AND provide bodies OR good clear pictures of all the 'dead' animals for examination, to be 100% positive that they did not die from poorly adminstered medications or surgeries/alterations.
Seeing how high the percentage of negative patient outcome is for voided snakes, I would make every attempt at obtaining pictures from the previous owner, to provide positive identification of ALL the dead animals claimed.
(If I were KY or anyone wasin this situation, I would demand the pictures be done in a certain way, just to be 100% sure that all the pictures are not just the same snake, over and over, posed as all five.)
O'anus has only provided ONE picture of THREE dead green mambas, NOT the five claimed to be dead now, and certainly not the FOUR claimed to be dead on arrival.
Just because KY is a bad guy here, does not mean he cannot be defended in an obviously skewed situation.
Just because O'anus made a claim he cannot prove against KY, does not automatically make O'anus the good guy and KY in this situation.
Even bad guys can be wronged.
Do they not deserve to be defended just as well as others that are being wronged?