• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

"mike" BD ad on Kingsnake.com

If he wants the $25 thats fine. To end this bullshit already, the money just isn't worth it.
 
I'll toss my .02 into the ring on this transaction.

D Dragon, I would write this transaction off and walk away. You like a million others are disappointed in the color of the animal you received and think that it may have been represented falsely. I for one can't tell what dragon is what anymore, and which ad had what picture, so I really don't have an opinion on that. Be thankful you have a nice healthy dragon for the $75.00 you spent. I have opened boxes and been tricked, disappointed etc etc etc........ I always go back and look at the pics, ad, writing and see where I messed up. Usually as I can see in this case, it was my stupidity to respond to the ad in the first place. It was vague in the terms and description, the pics were not crystal clear, it was an unknown breeder with no last name, etc etc etc........

Just write this one off as a lesson learned and next time shop around and find yourself a breeder who goes the extra mile to make you happy.


"Mr Jones/Miller", I think you are one of the people who post obscure, nondescript ads with fuzzy pics purposely. It's not easy selling low end dragons for high end prices is it??? I have seen many other ads like yours and read many other complaints just like this one. I just pass them over cause I have been there done that. It sucks opening a box looking for a yellow dragon and finding a normal. I may be wrong about you but for now this is my opinion. Prove me wrong.

You want to be taken seriously??? Create and ad that actually has information in it. Your full name, business name, location, bloodlines, prices, clear pictures, correct contact info............ You get the idea, right????




I think both parties here made mistakes during this transaction. I would say to you both. Cut your losses, learn from this transaction and move on.

I just got home from having an endoscopy done so I hope that this post makes sense. I'm not 100% awake yet. Hopefully spellcheck does the thinking for me.
 
dragonman22 said:
If he wants the $25 thats fine. To end this bullshit already, the money just isn't worth it.

Does that sound fair to you Chris? I honestly don't seea bad guy on either side here. Chris's expectations were a bit high for a bargain animal and Mike isn't much of a photagrapher.

Chris...it's up to you to give the green light here and put this to bed
 
dragonman22 said:
.

4th I don't know where you buy your dragons, but I have never seen any single dragon on sale anywhere for $25. Go into any petstore and every beardie will cost between $75-$100 regardless of color.
Which is why most of "us" don't buy from pet stores. Moot and invalid comparison. I can buy premium herps for less than b grade pet store animals any day of the week.
 
reptilebreeder said:
Which is why most of "us" don't buy from pet stores. Moot and invalid comparison. I can buy premium herps for less than b grade pet store animals any day of the week.
PS. you don't have to pay shipping (well not directly anyway, operating costs are built in to the price) at the pet store, so include the price he paid for the animal, plus shipping when you compare a crappy pet store animal to your's.
 
D Dragon said:
Hey I ordered A sunburst dragon, was told I was getting one, was showed pics of one, and what did I get? A nice health common. He knew this was a common. How much I payed or how much he charged is irrelevant.

I think this is a very relevant post. You saw an advertisement for a 'colorful' dragon with a pic of a bright yellow dragon.
There is a lot of irrelevant 'red herring' talk here but it all comes down to the fact that you were lured into purchase by the ad and your dragon did not conform to what was advertised.
Strange, the seller claims 'numerous' emails thanking him for other purchased dragons; not only has he not posted proof of these but somehow the TRULY relevant emails are conveniently gone, the ones the seller sent a month ago, were (in the seller's own words) 'automatically deleted' by his mail system.
 
????

dragonman22 said:
First off, I have NO IDEA what this guy is talking about in terms of oweing anyone else money especially in California. You and your california friend may have me confused with someone else. I have not sold anything to anyone in california EVER. I am NOT a middle man and I DO live in NJ you lunatic.

Second, That picture is 100% real. I don't have time nor the skill to touch up photographs. Those nails are dark nails.

3rd and most important. Whose opinion do I value more. Sara, some 20 year old girl from Pennsylvania or Mr Schmitt the well known and respected owner of Suncoast Herps.

4th I don't know where you buy your dragons, but I have never seen any single dragon on sale anywhere for $25. Go into any petstore and every beardie will cost between $75-$100 regardless of color.

5th, If you really think it is a 100% normal dragon, go get a DNA test done and compare it with a normal beardie and I guarantee the results. I have 1 male dragon and he is pictured.

Mike Jones
Hey Mike what part of NJ you from?
 
dragonman22 said:
3rd and most important. Whose opinion do I value more. Sara, some 20 year old girl from Pennsylvania or Mr Schmitt the well known and respected owner of Suncoast Herps.

Cheap shot. This is known as an 'ad hominem' attack: instead of addressing the issues themselves you go after some personal quality of whoever posted.

A seller of integrity will address all serious opinions and issues, after all, it is their reputation at stake and how they treat those who post with opinions and questions is relevant to their future rep.
 
Rebel Dragons said:
D Dragon, I would write this transaction off and walk away.

This is the LAST thing I would think of doing in this situation. I do not think there was anything fuzzy or uncertain about this transaction, colorful dragons were advertised, colorful dragons were pictured, money was sent to buy the aforementioned colorful dragon, and a plain normal was sent.

This seller should either give a total refund and allow the buyer to keep the dragon, or should send at his own expense, a colorful dragon which was advertised from the getgo and STILL allow this buyer to keep the normal. For the buyer to shell out any nore money for shipping would be a travesty of justice.
 
lucille said:
This is the LAST thing I would think of doing in this situation. I do not think there was anything fuzzy or uncertain about this transaction, colorful dragons were advertised, colorful dragons were pictured, money was sent to buy the aforementioned colorful dragon, and a plain normal was sent.

This seller should either give a total refund and allow the buyer to keep the dragon, or should send at his own expense, a colorful dragon which was advertised from the getgo and STILL allow this buyer to keep the normal. For the buyer to shell out any nore money for shipping would be a travesty of justice.

OK Lucille, I'll play along.

Check the terms on MANY peoples websites. A lot of them say if you are not satisfied with the animal and you let them know within the guarantee period (provided that there is one) a replacement animal will be sent. Only after the original animal has been returned at the BUYERS EXPENSE. I feel both sides here screwed up in diffrent ways. I think it would be a "travesty of justice" for either party to spend more money on this transaction than already spent.

I don't see either of them as "bad guys". I see a couple people who are probably learning a good lesson in internet business. Right now the seller has $75.00 and the buyer has a "normal" dragon. At least they both have something to show for this transaction. It's called cutting your losses, Lucille. Or they can keep fighting back and forth and ship this and ship that to the point that this $75.00 dragon ends up costing $300.00 and they are both out time, money and dragons. That's why I think they have to ask themselves if $75.00 is worth all this hassle...................


That's why I said they should both just walk away. I certainly don't agree with your "freebie" philosophy in your last paragraph. :toiletcla No one side deserves to be out "completely" in this transaction. Mistakes were made but it's possible that they were innocent and no great "scam" or "rip-off" was uncovered.
 
the way I see it

Rebel Dragons said:
OK Lucille, I'll play along.

Check the terms on MANY peoples websites. A lot of them say if you are not satisfied with the animal and you let them know within the guarantee period (provided that there is one) a replacement animal will be sent. Only after the original animal has been returned at the BUYERS EXPENSE. I feel both sides here screwed up in diffrent ways. I think it would be a "travesty of justice" for either party to spend more money on this transaction than already spent.

I don't see either of them as "bad guys". I see a couple people who are probably learning a good lesson in internet business. Right now the seller has $75.00 and the buyer has a "normal" dragon. At least they both have something to show for this transaction. It's called cutting your losses, Lucille. Or they can keep fighting back and forth and ship this and ship that to the point that this $75.00 dragon ends up costing $300.00 and they are both out time, money and dragons. That's why I think they have to ask themselves if $75.00 is worth all this hassle...................


That's why I said they should both just walk away. I certainly don't agree with your "freebie" philosophy in your last paragraph. :toiletcla No one side deserves to be out "completely" in this transaction. Mistakes were made but it's possible that they were innocent and no great "scam" or "rip-off" was uncovered.
I have to agree with you on this one.....its called a learning curve
 
The second time I bought a dragon online I thought I found a great deal. The orange dragon was only $50.00 with shipping of $40.00. I sent the $90.00 and waited for the dragon to arrive. The next morning I received the package. It had a beautiful gray rock in it. I was pissed at first but after a while I wrote it off. I paid $90.00 for a lesson in finding and avoiding shady advertisements for dragons. I would rather pay extra to a known breeder and get what I want, than to look for and find the "great deals".

One dragon for $75.00 or 5 dragons for $100.00........... That would have sent up a red flag for me. It just don't add up and makes me wonder what the catch is. Well it turns out the catch is that your going to get a normal.

Lesson learned :ack2:
 
Rebel Dragons said:
The second time I bought a dragon online I thought I found a great deal. The orange dragon was only $50.00 with shipping of $40.00. I sent the $90.00 and waited for the dragon to arrive. The next morning I received the package. It had a beautiful gray rock in it. I was pissed at first but after a while I wrote it off.

Why are you on the BOI, Mike? The BOI is for people to get help righting their grievances, not for rock collectors.

There is no way I would EVER buy ANYTHING from this seller.

Rebel Dragons said:
One dragon for $75.00 or 5 dragons for $100.00........... That would have sent up a red flag for me. It just don't add up and makes me wonder what the catch is. Well it turns out the catch is that your going to get a normal.

Ahh, the old days of 'caveat emptor', buyer beware: that even though there are specific descriptions and pictures, you should know to discount them because of the price, and of course you ought to know exactly to the dollar when the seller REALLY means what he says or when he is just joshing (lying) based on the precise dollar amount.

Those days are gone, because it is now unlawful to advertise one thing and sell another.
 
Been watching.

Lucille,
The days of "caveat emptor" are not gone. They will outlive the both of us. Take this case about "colorful" vs. "not colorful" into any attorney's office and watch him or her try not to be disrespectful in telling you to "learn from your mistakes". That includes if you are carrying a large-text copy of the entire UCC. If the claim is for $75, what person is going to spend hundreds if not more trying to recover it, where the court will scoff at awarding all except filing fees, etc?

And this:
Originally Posted by dragonman22:

3rd and most important. Whose opinion do I value more. Sara, some 20 year old girl from Pennsylvania or Mr Schmitt the well known and respected owner of Suncoast Herps.

... is not this:
Originally posted by Lucille:

Cheap shot. This is known as an 'ad hominem' attack: instead of addressing the issues themselves you go after some personal quality of whoever posted.

One of these days you'll get to the law school class about "expert witnesses", and the fundamental basis of civil opinions, that being that some are worth more than others. One entity voluntarily rendered an opinion here contrary to another. They do not carry the same weight for exactly the reason stated. It was anything but "ad-hominem". He did not say she was ugly. He did not say she was stupid. He did not say she was fat.

IMO, John S. has taken time in this thread to present sound opinions and hopefully mediate a solution. Mike S. was on the money too. The seller has been willing to do something. What this thread has done is establish a basis upon which people can evaluate both buyer and seller. I would extend the theory that that is the main accomplishment of the BOI, regardless of what folks wish it to be.
 
Chameleon Company said:
Lucille,
The days of "caveat emptor" are not gone. They will outlive the both of us. Take this case about "colorful" vs. "not colorful" into any attorney's office and watch him or her try not to be disrespectful in telling you to "learn from your mistakes". That includes if you are carrying a large-text copy of the entire UCC. If the claim is for $75, what person is going to spend hundreds if not more trying to recover it, where the court will scoff at awarding all except filing fees, etc?

And this:


... is not this:


One of these days you'll get to the law school class about "expert witnesses", and the fundamental basis of civil opinions, that being that some are worth more than others. One entity voluntarily rendered an opinion here contrary to another. They do not carry the same weight for exactly the reason stated. It was anything but "ad-hominem". He did not say she was ugly. He did not say she was stupid. He did not say she was fat.

IMO, John S. has taken time in this thread to present sound opinions and hopefully mediate a solution. Mike S. was on the money too. The seller has been willing to do something. What this thread has done is establish a basis upon which people can evaluate both buyer and seller. I would extend the theory that that is the main accomplishment of the BOI, regardless of what folks wish it to be.

Well put, Jim
Excellent post!
 
Chameleon Company said:
Lucille,
The days of "caveat emptor" are not gone. They will outlive the both of us. Take this case about "colorful" vs. "not colorful" into any attorney's office and watch him or her try not to be disrespectful in telling you to "learn from your mistakes". That includes if you are carrying a large-text copy of the entire UCC. If the claim is for $75, what person is going to spend hundreds if not more trying to recover it, where the court will scoff at awarding all except filing fees, etc?

And this:


... is not this:


One of these days you'll get to the law school class about "expert witnesses", and the fundamental basis of civil opinions, that being that some are worth more than others. One entity voluntarily rendered an opinion here contrary to another. They do not carry the same weight for exactly the reason stated. It was anything but "ad-hominem". He did not say she was ugly. He did not say she was stupid. He did not say she was fat.

IMO, John S. has taken time in this thread to present sound opinions and hopefully mediate a solution. Mike S. was on the money too. The seller has been willing to do something. What this thread has done is establish a basis upon which people can evaluate both buyer and seller. I would extend the theory that that is the main accomplishment of the BOI, regardless of what folks wish it to be.

Damn...I hate it when we agree Jim.

Couldn't have said it any better
 
Why are you on the BOI, Mike? The BOI is for people to get help righting their grievances, not for rock collectors.
Talk about cheap shots Lucille. A jab at someone who has actually been scammed is very constructive.

There is no way I would EVER buy ANYTHING from this seller.

I think that you are in the minority here. After asking the proper questions I would have no problem taking a chance on this seller



Ahh, the old days of 'caveat emptor', buyer beware: that even though there are specific descriptions and pictures, you should know to discount them because of the price, and of course you ought to know exactly to the dollar when the seller REALLY means what he says or when he is just joshing (lying) based on the precise dollar amount.

I would love to go with you to buy a used car. With that attitude, it would be a hoot.

Those days are gone, because it is now unlawful to advertise one thing and sell another


Happily that did not happen here Lucille. At worst this is a "shades of gray" situation

Keep us posted on the weather in Utopia Lucille. It sounds like a neat place to live.
 
My whole reasoning for starting this thread was not to get into a money war! Of coarse I would like my money back, I got ripped off, who wouldn't want the satisfaction of a reward and the chance to further seek out what I was originally looking for. A Yellow Dragon. I just wanted everyone interested in buying a bearded dragon to be aware of this scam artist lurking on kingsnake and who knows where else, waiting for you to send your hard earned money into an empty pit. I don't know about the rest of everyone else but I work hard for my money(firefighter/EMT=low pay) and 75 dollars might not seem like a lot to you but by the time I saved up 75 dollars plus the 50 to ship the dragon my reptile money was gone. So god forbid I actually believed I found a good deal of a highly colored yellow dragon for 75 dollars. And all this about the ad for the lot of dragons for 100, This was not placed on kingsnake until after I bought my "common" dragon. The ad was for a sunburst dragon (dragons Den bloodline) for 75 dollars.
 
Back
Top