kmurphy
New member
a mr miller shipped me the dragon from NJ
Chris could you explain this a little more. Thanks
a mr miller shipped me the dragon from NJ
dragonman22 said:If he wants the $25 thats fine. To end this bullshit already, the money just isn't worth it.
Which is why most of "us" don't buy from pet stores. Moot and invalid comparison. I can buy premium herps for less than b grade pet store animals any day of the week.dragonman22 said:.
4th I don't know where you buy your dragons, but I have never seen any single dragon on sale anywhere for $25. Go into any petstore and every beardie will cost between $75-$100 regardless of color.
PS. you don't have to pay shipping (well not directly anyway, operating costs are built in to the price) at the pet store, so include the price he paid for the animal, plus shipping when you compare a crappy pet store animal to your's.reptilebreeder said:Which is why most of "us" don't buy from pet stores. Moot and invalid comparison. I can buy premium herps for less than b grade pet store animals any day of the week.
D Dragon said:Hey I ordered A sunburst dragon, was told I was getting one, was showed pics of one, and what did I get? A nice health common. He knew this was a common. How much I payed or how much he charged is irrelevant.
Hey Mike what part of NJ you from?dragonman22 said:First off, I have NO IDEA what this guy is talking about in terms of oweing anyone else money especially in California. You and your california friend may have me confused with someone else. I have not sold anything to anyone in california EVER. I am NOT a middle man and I DO live in NJ you lunatic.
Second, That picture is 100% real. I don't have time nor the skill to touch up photographs. Those nails are dark nails.
3rd and most important. Whose opinion do I value more. Sara, some 20 year old girl from Pennsylvania or Mr Schmitt the well known and respected owner of Suncoast Herps.
4th I don't know where you buy your dragons, but I have never seen any single dragon on sale anywhere for $25. Go into any petstore and every beardie will cost between $75-$100 regardless of color.
5th, If you really think it is a 100% normal dragon, go get a DNA test done and compare it with a normal beardie and I guarantee the results. I have 1 male dragon and he is pictured.
Mike Jones
dragonman22 said:3rd and most important. Whose opinion do I value more. Sara, some 20 year old girl from Pennsylvania or Mr Schmitt the well known and respected owner of Suncoast Herps.
Rebel Dragons said:D Dragon, I would write this transaction off and walk away.
lucille said:This is the LAST thing I would think of doing in this situation. I do not think there was anything fuzzy or uncertain about this transaction, colorful dragons were advertised, colorful dragons were pictured, money was sent to buy the aforementioned colorful dragon, and a plain normal was sent.
This seller should either give a total refund and allow the buyer to keep the dragon, or should send at his own expense, a colorful dragon which was advertised from the getgo and STILL allow this buyer to keep the normal. For the buyer to shell out any nore money for shipping would be a travesty of justice.
No one side deserves to be out "completely" in this transaction. Mistakes were made but it's possible that they were innocent and no great "scam" or "rip-off" was uncovered.I have to agree with you on this one.....its called a learning curveRebel Dragons said:OK Lucille, I'll play along.
Check the terms on MANY peoples websites. A lot of them say if you are not satisfied with the animal and you let them know within the guarantee period (provided that there is one) a replacement animal will be sent. Only after the original animal has been returned at the BUYERS EXPENSE. I feel both sides here screwed up in diffrent ways. I think it would be a "travesty of justice" for either party to spend more money on this transaction than already spent.
I don't see either of them as "bad guys". I see a couple people who are probably learning a good lesson in internet business. Right now the seller has $75.00 and the buyer has a "normal" dragon. At least they both have something to show for this transaction. It's called cutting your losses, Lucille. Or they can keep fighting back and forth and ship this and ship that to the point that this $75.00 dragon ends up costing $300.00 and they are both out time, money and dragons. That's why I think they have to ask themselves if $75.00 is worth all this hassle...................
That's why I said they should both just walk away. I certainly don't agree with your "freebie" philosophy in your last paragraph.No one side deserves to be out "completely" in this transaction. Mistakes were made but it's possible that they were innocent and no great "scam" or "rip-off" was uncovered.

Rebel Dragons said:The second time I bought a dragon online I thought I found a great deal. The orange dragon was only $50.00 with shipping of $40.00. I sent the $90.00 and waited for the dragon to arrive. The next morning I received the package. It had a beautiful gray rock in it. I was pissed at first but after a while I wrote it off.
Rebel Dragons said:One dragon for $75.00 or 5 dragons for $100.00........... That would have sent up a red flag for me. It just don't add up and makes me wonder what the catch is. Well it turns out the catch is that your going to get a normal.
Originally Posted by dragonman22:
3rd and most important. Whose opinion do I value more. Sara, some 20 year old girl from Pennsylvania or Mr Schmitt the well known and respected owner of Suncoast Herps.
Originally posted by Lucille:
Cheap shot. This is known as an 'ad hominem' attack: instead of addressing the issues themselves you go after some personal quality of whoever posted.
Chameleon Company said:Lucille,
The days of "caveat emptor" are not gone. They will outlive the both of us. Take this case about "colorful" vs. "not colorful" into any attorney's office and watch him or her try not to be disrespectful in telling you to "learn from your mistakes". That includes if you are carrying a large-text copy of the entire UCC. If the claim is for $75, what person is going to spend hundreds if not more trying to recover it, where the court will scoff at awarding all except filing fees, etc?
And this:
... is not this:
One of these days you'll get to the law school class about "expert witnesses", and the fundamental basis of civil opinions, that being that some are worth more than others. One entity voluntarily rendered an opinion here contrary to another. They do not carry the same weight for exactly the reason stated. It was anything but "ad-hominem". He did not say she was ugly. He did not say she was stupid. He did not say she was fat.
IMO, John S. has taken time in this thread to present sound opinions and hopefully mediate a solution. Mike S. was on the money too. The seller has been willing to do something. What this thread has done is establish a basis upon which people can evaluate both buyer and seller. I would extend the theory that that is the main accomplishment of the BOI, regardless of what folks wish it to be.
Chameleon Company said:Lucille,
The days of "caveat emptor" are not gone. They will outlive the both of us. Take this case about "colorful" vs. "not colorful" into any attorney's office and watch him or her try not to be disrespectful in telling you to "learn from your mistakes". That includes if you are carrying a large-text copy of the entire UCC. If the claim is for $75, what person is going to spend hundreds if not more trying to recover it, where the court will scoff at awarding all except filing fees, etc?
And this:
... is not this:
One of these days you'll get to the law school class about "expert witnesses", and the fundamental basis of civil opinions, that being that some are worth more than others. One entity voluntarily rendered an opinion here contrary to another. They do not carry the same weight for exactly the reason stated. It was anything but "ad-hominem". He did not say she was ugly. He did not say she was stupid. He did not say she was fat.
IMO, John S. has taken time in this thread to present sound opinions and hopefully mediate a solution. Mike S. was on the money too. The seller has been willing to do something. What this thread has done is establish a basis upon which people can evaluate both buyer and seller. I would extend the theory that that is the main accomplishment of the BOI, regardless of what folks wish it to be.
Talk about cheap shots Lucille. A jab at someone who has actually been scammed is very constructive.Why are you on the BOI, Mike? The BOI is for people to get help righting their grievances, not for rock collectors.
There is no way I would EVER buy ANYTHING from this seller.
Ahh, the old days of 'caveat emptor', buyer beware: that even though there are specific descriptions and pictures, you should know to discount them because of the price, and of course you ought to know exactly to the dollar when the seller REALLY means what he says or when he is just joshing (lying) based on the precise dollar amount.
Those days are gone, because it is now unlawful to advertise one thing and sell another