Mods who are SOOOOO smart they don't even have to read the guidelines

[WebSlave]

The same thing has happened to me as well, Harald. THe email notifications have been quite sporadic lately.....but I do remember getting multiple notifications for threads that I hadn't received any notification on at all before. As of the last few days, I haven't been receiving more than one or 2 notifications per day.....and we all know I post on more threads than that, lol. I'm waiting for them to all come in at once again.

Actually this is a change that was made on the server rather recently. Instead of having notification emails sent immediately for each incident of a subscribed thread being posted on, these now are processed in a batch mode. This is supposed to help reduce the loading on the server. I can't remember the exact date I made this change, but it is rather recent.....

Truth of the matter is that I am now looking at another server host anyway. It appears the slowness problems may actually be originating at the data center and not the loading on the server at all...

 

[DThomas]

The only other karma left to Ed by Sammy was on 26 Nov 2006 at 13:27 and consisted of "WTF, Ed?"

Actually, there was one other on 04/10 but there were no comments.

A total of 3 ever and in that time span, does not signal abuse to me.

 

[Cat_72]

I just normally get a "daily" notification, all at once, not every time there is a new post on a thread.

 

[Dr Owens]

Jay, please verify that I was neg repped by Shrap as a direct result of warning Wes.

Sammy used the karma system to take a shot at me because he did not like me giving Wes a warning for the post that got Wes banned.

Yes Jay, please verify that Ed is nothing but a stone cold LIAR.

And now you want to drag someone else into this and try to get them to lie for you too? Wow. Where does your unethical crap end Ed? You sir are truly one of the bad guys.

Wes was banned at approximately 6 pm on 5/21/2007. Sammy said this to Ed at one minute past midnight on 5/22/2007:

shrap 00:01, 22nd May 2007 There you go Ed.... make a stand when the man is banned. I try so hard to not dislike you, but you make it so hard.

Ed,
I cannot "verify that [you were] neg repped by Shrap as a direct result of warning Wes" as I feel that this is an inaccurate statment.

I will refrain from offering an opinion in this manner (at least for now*) in an attempt to remain (at least for now*) somewhat impartial.




* I feel the need to include this disclaimer...just in case.

 

[Dr Owens]

I guess that I was a little slow in getting to that...

Sorry...I had snakes to feed...and (more) eggs to put in the incubator.

 

[varnyard]

Awesome Jay on the new eggs!!

As for Karma, I have a question, why is Karma points here? Are they for people to judge someone's post?
If they think it was bad, then they have the right to give them karma that they think fits the post, or good karma for that matter. But giving someone a bad karma once in over a month is not what I call an attack by any means.

 

[Dr Owens]

Awesome Jay on the new eggs!!

Thanks Bobby!

The last couple years were kind of slow production wise because I was really distracted by taking care of my dad while he was sick, and then I had a lot of responsibility fall on me after he died. I'm more than making up for it this year though...in spite of my work schedule.

 

[WebSlave]

As for Karma, I have a question, why is Karma points here? Are they for people to judge someone's post?
If they think it was bad, then they have the right to give them karma that they think fits the post, or good karma for that matter.

Yeah, basically it's supposed to be a feedback system of what people think about your posts. But it appears to be used mostly as a spite laden weapon on this site by some members. I believe I may change it so that NO ONE can give anyone else negative karma, only positive karma, if appropriate. In other words, if you can't say something nice about someone's post, then don't say anything at all.

I'll think this over for a bit....

 

[Dr Owens]

Yeah, basically it's supposed to be a feedback system of what people think about your posts. But it appears to be used mostly as a spite laden weapon on this site by some members. I believe I may change it so that NO ONE can give anyone else negative karma, only positive karma, if appropriate. In other words, if you can't say something nice about someone's post, then don't say anything at all.

I'll think this over for a bit....

Well hell Rich, if you're going to do that, you might as well change the name from Karma to "Warm Fuzzies."

No "Cold Pricklies" on this forum!


(Will someone with kids please tell me if they still teach that crap in grade school?)

 

[hhmoore]

If doing away with the negative karma (which is already restricted to paid members), is there really a point in having positive karma? While I understand it is just a nicety, and a way of patting people on the back, it seems it would lose something if we couldn't smack them in the forehead now and again.
I wouldn't say that I give a lot of negative, but there are posts for which it is clearly indicated. In those cases I can make a click and move on. Without it, frankly, I would probably end up making my opinion known within the thread. At least this way, it is between me and the poster. Less clutter in the forum. I guess there are always PM's...but that is even more time consuming.

 

[shrap]

Well Ed, you have came and gone from this thread many times. What do you have to say for your lying unethical self?

You really think you can repeatedly tell lies about people to try to hurt them and ignoring it when you get caught will make it go away?

You are scum, Ed. An official BAD GUY in my book..... not to mention in countless others based on the amount of emails I have received in the last few hours.

 

[varnyard]

Well Ed, you have came and gone from this thread many times. What do you have to say for your lying unethical self?

You really think you can repeatedly tell lies about people to try to hurt them and ignoring it when you get caught will make it go away?

You are scum, Ed. An official BAD GUY in my book..... not to mention in countless others based on the amount of emails I have received in the last few hours.

He also locked his so called morph thread again. Now, you must ask yourself, why would he do this if he had nothing to hide. As/ has stated before, Ed you are quite the good guy.

Please, do tell about these constant attacks by Sammy on your karma.

 

[DThomas]

He also locked his so called morph thread again.

Thank you for pointing out that thread was re-opened.

I am going to say this once Ed. DO NOT EVER re-open a thread a Super Mod has closed. It matters not if it's one of your classifieds. We close threads for a reason and Rich is the only one that over turns our decisions.

 

[Chameleon Company]

I'm on hiatus again after this post,

And back to the bliss that is not getting caught up in the stupidity that so many wallow in here. There are many good folks here wasting way too much time arguing with idiots.

Kevin and others, I thank you for your kind words. Erin, I did see the humor in your posts, although it was a tad "inexpensive", to be kind.

Sammy, you are home here. Muddle in it as you will. As sure as the sky is blue, I can look back into Fauna next week, next month, and likely next year, and it won't be hard to find the stupid tit-for-tat thread-du-jour. It'll be the same folks strutting the same ignorance. Its a lock. Best of wishes.

 

[Dr Owens]

And back to the bliss that is not getting caught up in the stupidity that so many wallow in here. There are many good folks here wasting way too much time arguing with idiots.

Kevin and others, I thank you for your kind words. Erin, I did see the humor in your posts, although it was a tad "inexpensive", to be kind.

Sammy, you are home here. Muddle in it as you will. As sure as the sky is blue, I can look back into Fauna next week, next month, and likely next year, and it won't be hard to find the stupid tit-for-tat thread-du-jour. It'll be the same folks strutting the same ignorance. Its a lock. Best of wishes.

Jim,
Why are you scolding people for doing things that you yourself were doing just a short time ago?

I'm not asking this in an effort to be insulting, it is an honest question. You know, that whole pot/kettle thing?

 

[shrap]

And back to the bliss that is not getting caught up in the stupidity that so many wallow in here. There are many good folks here wasting way too much time arguing with idiots.

Kevin and others, I thank you for your kind words. Erin, I did see the humor in your posts, although it was a tad "inexpensive", to be kind.

Sammy, you are home here. Muddle in it as you will. As sure as the sky is blue, I can look back into Fauna next week, next month, and likely next year, and it won't be hard to find the stupid tit-for-tat thread-du-jour. It'll be the same folks strutting the same ignorance. Its a lock. Best of wishes.

As always Jim, I have nothing but love for you my friend. Take care.

 

[Seamus Haley]

Jim,
Why are you scolding people for doing things that you yourself were doing just a short time ago?

He didn't exactly stop when he decided to "come back" either.

His return was followed immediately by a series of posts pointing out how much better he was than _______ now that he had stopped getting into fights about how much better he was than _______, who he used to get into arguments with all the time.

He is not subtle.

 

[WebSlave]

I guess I need to remind everyone that THIS is a warnable offense here:

Attack on a member outside of the BOI

If no one else is willing to enforce it, or those people engaging in this sort of thing refuse to cease and desist, then I certainly will enforce it, and those points will rack up rapidly. I will also enforce it from the day I made that as a warning. I am also not going to be shy about handing out three day passes to hang out elsewhere.

Consider this a "pre-warning" warning. And in case no one has noticed, THIS forum is NOT the BOI.

 

[brucestephenson]

I have had a major transaction with Ed, and I know Ed to be a good guy. My personal opinion is that the war on Ed is an "eliminate my competition" thing brought on because Ed may have refused to lower his asking price on a nice snake for a certain individual or individuals here. This may have taken place well in the past, but now it is revenge time. Just my theory and opinion.

 

[shrap]

Then, in post #56 Rich proves that Wes is lying, because he shows that a mod can not ding anyone more than once a day.

I think this is wrong as well Erin. Look at the dates of the warnings and who gave them in the following screen shot. I see 3 in one day by one mod and 2 in one day by another mod. I am not counting the Super mods, but the two (Bryon and Laura) other mods.