Is it common for someone to just send money without even talking to the seller first? That seems odd.
Anyways, maybe we should take this discussion to the business discussion forums as there are lots of view points and I think it would make for a good thread. I don't want to go too far off topic.
Obviously the seller in this case only cared about getting the $ from whoever sent it first.
While I agree that this would make a great generic discussion, I'm going to respond here.
It may not be common for someon to just send money without first interacting with the seller, but
it is done. I've done it myself. Look at it this way - as a buyer your are searching for an animal with specific traits, and not accepting anything that doesn't have the right look. One night, you are looking through the classifieds - and there she is. The price is right, and the look is awesome. You're sure that the seller will get many inquiries, including serious buyers...how do you move to the front of the line? You PAY for the snake. It takes a couple minutes to do a BOI search, then a few more to try to find payment information if it isn't posted; but it can often be done. Send payment, then an email stating that you have sent payment in full. There might be 30 inquiries ahead of you, but you have just stepped up and shown yourself to be the buyer. There are obviously reasons that it might not work out for you, but you've made your best effort.
Some people build shopping carts into their sites, so purchase is as simple as the click of a button
Now, the reason I posted here instead of waiting.
The OP put an unfavorable label on the seller. I've been in his shoes - having had snakes "sold out from under me" while I was waiting for payment information to be provided. I was not happy....however, as much of the response here has indicated, many sellers operate on a
first to pay is the buyer policy. There is nothing wrong with that; and I find comments that the seller only cared about getting the money to be somewhat silly (and perhaps a little offensive). Why do any of us advertise animals? To sell them. Each seller is free to make his/her own decision whether to allow somebody time to make payment....and, in choosing to do so, needs to accept that turning away other buyers may result in not getting a sale.
I may not be a fan of Vinny - regardless of whether my single buying experience, or his antics here, are more to blame - but as long as he refunded the OPs payment promptly, I can't view him as a bad guy IN THIS CASE.
To put a slightly different perspective on it, what if the seller was somebody with multiple good guy threads? Let's use me as an example - what if
I was the one that accepted somebody else's payment, and refunded another buyer (or two) that really wanted a particular snake? Would I be criticized for taking the quick sale...the first payment? I've got news for you - I've done it. I've also declined sales simply because I didn't want to deal with the purchaser. I think most people - except, perhaps, the offended parties - would say that is my right.
To the OP - I feel your pain. Like I said earlier in this post, I've been there...had snakes that I really wanted, and had every intention of purchasing, sold after I had discussed payment options with the seller. Yes, I was upset at the time...but, from a business perspective, I can understand; because I have also had countless payment promises that went unfulfilled. You can say it is bad customer service to not allow a customer sufficient time to pay; but it is also bad business (and bad customer service) to turn away an actual payment in favor of one that may not arrive. Feel free to hold a grudge against the seller (I have, in some of those situations, lol), but accept it & continue your search.