Bad Guy Robert Nichols. "Chameleons Gone Wild" FB Forum Moderator. Miscreant.

[robmd1]

Shauna. You have to read the thread.

1) The transcripts of the calls were posted.

2) The police report number has been provided, and confirmed by the Polk County Sheriff's Office of Records. You can call them tomorrow.

3) Prior independent evidence of Robert Nichols making harassing phone calls to others has also been posted.

That is for starters.

So Shauna. Do you approve of Robert harassing folks ? Making obscene phone calls to the wives of people he had issues with ? Inquiring minds want to know. Thanks.

all that faked by jim and still nothing has EVER happened to me? jim you really do need a break have someone change your adult diaper and call it anight.. you can have another drunken bender tomorrow we promise

 

[hhmoore]

Caffeinecynic, Not to step out of line.. But Fauna's staff is being unnecessarily rude to everyone Except chameleon company. That would be the proper definition of biased.
bi·ased
\ˈbī-əst\
adjective
: having or showing a bias : having or showing an unfair tendency to believe that some people, ideas, etc., are better than others

Animallover - you ARE stepping out of line. In the second PM I sent you, I specifically directed you to the Fauna Feedback Forum for this type of discussion.
You are too new here to make educated claims of bias. If you think I am biased toward Jim Flaherty, ask him how many infractions I have given him over the years, and how many times I have removed his posting privileges.
Now, I shouldn't have to address the matter of you being disruptive/off topic in this thread again, correct? (That is a hint - it means: no more friendly warnings)

 

[robmd1]

Guess what. Robert Edward Nichols (Diane Nichols on caller ID if he calls you folks). I have the emails. Folks can think what they will, regardless. David has not the proof to substantiate his version of events. I do have such for mine.

Robert. You are doing exactly what I want you to do. This latest gang of Keystone Cops from CGW is doing exactly what I hoped for. I want 1000 lights shined on you all. I want a permanent record here of people, and what they say. It gets better tomorrow too.

Thank you. I mean it.

your a mental old man and should refer to my above post dude you've lost whatever old mind you had left . ill bet you walk around babbling my name with a full diaper

 

[Chameleon Company]

Animallover - you ARE stepping out of line. In the second PM I sent you, I specifically directed you to the Fauna Feedback Forum for this type of discussion.
You are too new here to make educated claims of bias. If you think I am biased toward Jim Flaherty, ask him how many infractions I have given him over the years, and how many times I have removed his posting privileges.
Now, I shouldn't have to address the matter of you being disruptive/off topic in this thread again, correct? (That is a hint - it means: no more friendly warnings)

You know that you have me smiling there Harald. Rich is probably enjoying it as well, as he and I have a "history" as well.

But here I am again. Trying to be civil. Thanks.

 

[WebSlave]

Warning: OK gang, that's enough with the profanity within posts as well as derogatory slurs and name calling directed at other members. From here on out I am requesting the mods to implement a "one strike you are out for three days" penalty for this thread until people can figure out how to be adult and act in a professional and mature manner. Re-registering to bypass the temporary ban makes the ban extend for 1 year for the original temp banned account and the bypassing registration perma-banned. And please note that if you already have previous infractions on your account, that three day immediate ban can push your accumulated infraction count into a higher bracket for an extended period of time of being banned.

I really don't care how the heck you all act elsewhere, it IS going to stop with your acting that way HERE.

 

[Chameleon Company]

your a mental old man and should refer to my above post dude you've lost whatever old mind you had left . ill bet you walk around babbling my name with a full diaper

You are most certainly the gift that keeps giving. When I say "thank you", I truly mean it. I really really do !!

 

[caffeinecynic]

Caffeinecynic, Not to step out of line.. But Fauna's staff is being unnecessarily rude to everyone Except chameleon company. That would be the proper definition of biased.
bi·ased
\ˈbī-əst\
adjective
: having or showing a bias : having or showing an unfair tendency to believe that some people, ideas, etc., are better than others

We are going to have to agree to disagree, as I do not think that any of the Fauna staff have been "unnecessarily rude" - or rude at all. Curt, perhaps, but I did not read anything they said as unprofessional.

That said, it's neither my job nor ambition to defend Fauna's moderators and administrators. They'll handle that themselves.

 

[hhmoore]

oh here we go again .. jim goin tell everyone his side but everyone else is wrong and ying and mods are helpin this lil ploy and its pathetic

That, sir, is quite enough. You have been warned earlier in this thread about taking pot shots at this site and the moderation team. You have been given quite a bit of leeway (and leniency) through the course of this thread; but if you continue to antagonize the moderation team, you will continue to incur infractions.

The ban that took Mr Nichols out of action was automatic, and due to accumulated infractions. It is temporary; but if he persists in the same manner, he won't be back for long. For the newer visitors to this site - Antagonism toward a moderator is a 9 point infraction; and it will speed one quickly toward the preset levels which trigger bans.

 

[ibchams]

Well David Echevaria. You should have started a new thread. I told you such several times in the last few years. But since you came here, let me show all how it went down. I have all communications and proof.

You purchased a female in like 2011. 10 days after getting her, you say she is doing great. One week later, you say she has a tongue issue. 17 days after you took possession. My fault ? OK David. It is always someone else's fault with you.

Then you were so distraught ... you bought from me again.

A wild-caught, imported Nosy Faly male. Check around folks, but imports typically have only a live arrival guarantee. Mine was one-day. But David wanted a breeder male, so he took a chance on a WC. He called me the day it arrived, and said it looked weak. So I extended the satisfaction/health guarantee for three days. To give David more time to decide if he wanted to return it.

David chose to keep it, and try to breed it. 8 days after receipt, David had tried to breed it, without success, and then said he wanted his money back. I pointed out that he had let the extended time guarantee expire. Imports are risky, but I had acted more than fairly to mitigate the risk.

The animal perished about 7 weeks later. I told David that while I owed him nothing, that I would make him a deal from the next batch of imported Nosy Faly males. Unfortunately, Madagascar put a moratorium on collection from that Locale before my next shipment, only just lifted this year, 3-4 years later. What I then told David was that I would gift him a 50% Faly male, worth about $200. Heck, Robert Nichols sold his crosses for $300 or more !! I gave it to David for free. I sent it to him. He continued to try to get me to sell him one of my own breeder males, which I told him that I could not spare. I truly had no spares. I apparently sucked so bad that David was still trying to give me his money. 3 months later. He begged me to sell him another.

David Echevaria. All this has been shown to you before. I have the communications. You are a liar.

Agree or disagree, this represents what I do for my customers. Every guarantee is stated in writing. We honor our TOS fully, and often go way beyond, as we did with David. That is why there are no BOI threads about our product and service. 10,000 chameleons sold.

wow Jim your a LIAR. THIS IS why I came forward with the prior post. yes I was happy with the female ,I was a newbie and at the time I heard you had good animals. I learned to cup feed her so she wouldn't starve. abs yes I bought again you posted a nice wc male. I wasn't ad at you the first time that's why I bought from you. on the waking dead faly you told me don't worry you'll take care of me I said what about the one day gaurantee? you said you'll extend it to see if he gets better over the weekend. (at the time I wasn't mad at you)you said don't take it to the vet save my $ because you were getting a new faly import aND you will replace it.I asked you would you breed it?you said yes they have parasites in the wild. I gave it panacure long noodle like worms came out of the poop, twice. I NEVER bred it you liar I didn't want to contaminate my cb females.
I got mad at you when you sent me an email saying animals in that condition you give them shots
I was pissed because why would you sell me an animal that you would put down.
you see leave it up to the readers to decide. I've never burned anyone with my chams, you have.
damn Jim I used to like picking your brain because of your knowledge of the panther chameleon.
do you remember when we used to talk I told you you should write a book on panthers? wow and now your lying of that I chose to keep the chameleon. and yes I still kept it kool trying to buy faly because at the time you were the only one bringing into wc faly you had got me for 500$ and I was so fascinated with the faly (still am) that I played nice to try to sell me a faly because no one was bringing them in. you even told me to new patient with faly. I'll find the emails and pictures of the walking dead faly and when you went from replacing a sick animal to where you were doing me a favor. your a snake Jim I lost all respect for you. and creating the nosy Flaherty Panther in florida? shame on you

 

[ibchams]

I just seen when you put you would give me a 50% Faly? ?? liar you told me to wait a few months without contacting you so the babies can grow up to make sure they are faly . wow Jim you sent a faly looking baby that grew up cross . stop lying . as you guys can see I'm not here defending anyone. I have no dog in this fight (I think that's how you say it) so I have no gain in telling the truth

 

[Dennis Hultman]

Question, if I may, why isn't he banned? I know it's off topic but cmon. I'm just point out the elephant or the scammer in the room.

Feedback Forum Is where the question belongs. The answer is posted in the rules section of this site and in the feedback section multiple times.

lam, I'll grab a few quotes for you. They expand the time since this site first began when there was no other place for people to give feedback on transactions.

Any discussion about the rules on this site needs to be discussed in the correct section.

There is thread where the pro's and cons have been debated at length that you can use or start your own. I thank you in advance for following-up there if you need to.

The site doesn't judge the merit of threads or individual opinions. The site itself doesn't make a determination of who is right or wrong. We do however enforce some basic rules. Most of the time you don't see when those rules are enforced because the infractions users receive are only visible to the individual and the moderators. The members here and the readers give what weight they deem appropriate to the individual posts and threads.

As far as your stance that we should be weeding people out for various practices - this has been addressed many times over. First and foremost, we are not going to serve as judge and jury on such matters. What is brought to the BOI is often one sided; and, if it isn't, the two sides frequently give different accounts of what happened. You want people with no intimate knowledge of the situation to take one person's side, and remove another person from this site? How many times have we seen questionable, petty, or flat out fabricated complaints brought against a seller (or buyer)? How many BOI posts are essentially one hit wonders - in which a buyer comes in & blasts somebody over some slight (real or perceived), but leaves out the fact that they were fully compensated by the seller...or the buyer fails to come back and update when the situation has been resolved?
Besides, us taking the stance that we will remove anybody shown not to have acceptable business practices would lead to an expectation that anybody advertising here is safe to deal with. Sorry, but a seller's reputation is only as good as his last documented transaction. "Good Guys" can screw people over, "Bad Guys" can provide healthy animals and acceptable customer service....heck, known "Bad Guys" can make good on problems, turn over a new leaf, and become "Good Guys" - it's happened. What are we to do in that case? What would be the process for reinstating somebody? Does making good on a particular transaction mean that the person won't screw up again? By the same token, does a person with an extensive (positive) history deserve to be banned because he feels an issue is not his fault & refuses to yield to the demands of a customer?


As far as the undercutting, sure, SOME scammers use the too good to be true pricing; but not all of them. If you want to talk about the economics and market pricing, there is a thread in the BP forum that includes a few "articles" by Colin Weaver (it should be required reading, lol). http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=278912

Rodney, So let's just say we all agree and scammers shouldn't be on here. That we weed them all out. So where do we start and who makes that call?

Who is going to be responsible if we weed out a honest person or miss a bad guy?

Who interprets correct business standards? Do we eliminated everyone we disagree with their return policy? Can you find a dozen "good guys" that agree on a set of standards? If you can, I think you also can find another who disagree with them.

The term "scammer" itself is very subjective. Do we just use it for this purpose for people who don't send product or animals? Or do we include people who don't honor a return? How do you prove they didn't honor the policy without a shadow of doubt?

It isn't such a cut and dry statement to state we should eliminated all scammers, liars and thieves.

Then you have to take into account the liability issue of a site who states they are removing "scammers". Sites operate under different rules that best protect themselves while catering to the needs of those that use their services. Some don't pay much attention to the legalities and some do.
But for most they operate under some framework to protect from liability.

Here people are allowed to post their experiences and information on the BOI and are accountable for their statements. Each individual makes those statements not the site. The site doesn't pronounce guilt. The individual readers give each post the weight they feel it deserves.

If it didn't work that way and the site was held accountable for what others do, nobody would have the ability to posts their experiences because the owner isn't going to accept that responsibility.

The site is able to give you the ability to post a BOI thread because we don't make those judgment calls of who is telling the truth and pronouncing guilt.
The readers and individual posters do that.

This is from ten years ago but your answer is there.

It appears that some people are under a misunderstanding about what the BOI is for and what my and the moderators designated responsibilities are here.

We have not been, are not now, and are not going to be judges in matters of how people or businesses conduct themselves in their own affairs. The BOI is a BOARD of Inquiry composed of all interested persons, such as yourselves, who will read whatever information is provided, and make their own decisions about what they are reading. We are NOT going to classify anyone as being innocent or guilty of any incident involving how they do business. Period.

What we DO here, in the capacity of caretakers, overseers, and moderators, is to try to put some structure and direction in how THIS place is run. EVERYTHING involving reputation points, warnings, as well as fines and suspensions are targeted solely at how someone acts on this site. What they do elsewhere is not our concern nor our responsibility. Someone can use profanity that would curl your hair all over the rest of the world, but ONLY when they use it here will they get dinged for it. That, I believe, is a reasonable approach to make on what our responsibilities and authority should be limited to.

As for the Good Guy Certification program, again, that is something that YOU all determine whether someone retains that certification or not. It is not a program whereby WE have designated someone as a good guy, or exclude someone because we feel they are a bad guy. Everyone applying is given the benefit of the doubt and it is SOLELY up to the members to determine whether they retain that certification or not by voting to that end. No, it is not perfect, and never will be. The only influence it can ever have is that someone can possibly LOSE their certification by not doing good business.

As for posting classified ads, again, no, it is not our job to determine whether or not you should buy from someone. That is YOUR job using the tools provided here for you to be able to make a well informed decision. We are NOT going to decide who is or is not qualified to post ads here based on any criteria whatsoever. It is your job to research the sellers adequately and sufficiently to make your own decisions about what to do. For us to do otherwise would likely be an extraordinarily stupid thing for me to do, in that by implication, I would be placing myself in legal jeopardy by making the implied assurance that all sellers here ARE guaranteed to be qualified to do business with based on the fact that they ARE selling here. That just is not going to happen, because it CAN'T realistically happen.

I hope this is somewhat clear to everyone. WE are not going to be judges, and WE are not going to do your homework for you. You have to make your own choices about what to think about anyone whom you are considering doing business with.

Originally Posted by WebSlave
We have not been, are not now, and are not going to be judges in matters of how people or businesses conduct themselves in their own affairs. The BOI is a BOARD of Inquiry composed of all interested persons, such as yourselves, who will read whatever information is provided, and make their own decisions about what they are reading. We are NOT going to classify anyone as being innocent or guilty of any incident involving how they do business. Period.

Originally Posted by WebSlave

As for posting classified ads, again, no, it is not our job to determine whether or not you should buy from someone. That is YOUR job using the tools provided here for you to be able to make a well informed decision. We are NOT going to decide who is or is not qualified to post ads here based on any criteria whatsoever. It is your job to research the sellers adequately and sufficiently to make your own decisions about what to do. For us to do otherwise would likely be an extraordinarily stupid thing for me to do, in that by implication, I would be placing myself in legal jeopardy by making the implied assurance that all sellers here ARE guaranteed to be qualified to do business with based on the fact that they ARE selling here. That just is not going to happen, because it CAN'T realistically happen.

Sorry, but no, and I've stated this MANY times over the years, we are not going to act as judges in incidents that we do not have any personal knowledge of. EVERYTHING is hearsay, when it comes right down to it. A person industrious enough can counterfeit any evidence that they care to. And certainly some do. Many get caught out, to their own detriment, but staff here is certainly not going to take on the burden and responsibility of spending our time and efforts to try to verify everything everyone posts in the BOI. We are NOT going to be judges in such matters. That is completely up to the readership to make up their own minds based on the opinions they form based on the evidence (real or otherwise) presented.

I'm sure some people would love to live in a world that is completely rubber baby buggy bumpered from one end to the next, top to bottom, but THIS site is just not that place. Members can swing a pretty sharp sword in the BOI, but soon learn that the blade certainly can cut both ways if their aim is not true.[/B]

Sorry, but we do not ban people just based on someone else's suspicions. Normally only violations of this site's rules and policies are grounds for banning.

Bear in mind that if you feel a person is violating the rules and policies, the burden will be on YOU to prove your case. We are not private investigators. Nor are we prone to act on vague unsubstantiatable claims. We are not all that keen on compounding your possible mistake with our own mistake.

So, FACTS and DETAILS, please. If this is going to be a public accusation against a member, then as has been suggested, the BOI will be your best bet as the appropriate venue for such a discussion.

 

[Chameleon Company]

wow Jim your a LIAR. THIS IS why I came forward with the prior post. yes I was happy with the female ,I was a newbie and at the time I heard you had good animals. I learned to cup feed her so she wouldn't starve. abs yes I bought again you posted a nice wc male. I wasn't ad at you the first time that's why I bought from you. on the waking dead faly you told me don't worry you'll take care of me I said what about the one day gaurantee? you said you'll extend it to see if he gets better over the weekend. (at the time I wasn't mad at you)you said don't take it to the vet save my $ because you were getting a new faly import aND you will replace it.I asked you would you breed it?you said yes they have parasites in the wild. I gave it panacure long noodle like worms came out of the poop, twice. I NEVER bred it you liar I didn't want to contaminate my cb females.
I got mad at you when you sent me an email saying animals in that condition you give them shots
I was pissed because why would you sell me an animal that you would put down.
you see leave it up to the readers to decide. I've never burned anyone with my chams, you have.
damn Jim I used to like picking your brain because of your knowledge of the panther chameleon.
do you remember when we used to talk I told you you should write a book on panthers? wow and now your lying of that I chose to keep the chameleon. and yes I still kept it kool trying to buy faly because at the time you were the only one bringing into wc faly you had got me for 500$ and I was so fascinated with the faly (still am) that I played nice to try to sell me a faly because no one was bringing them in. you even told me to new patient with faly. I'll find the emails and pictures of the walking dead faly and when you went from replacing a sick animal to where you were doing me a favor. your a snake Jim I lost all respect for you. and creating the nosy Flaherty Panther in florida? shame on you

David. My account stands. You told me that you tried to breed it. For anyone really trying to figure this out, it explains why you kept an animal beyond the extended guarantee that you probably should have returned. You wanted success, and I understand that. But not I, nor anyone, provides a guarantee that the customer can change at their whim. I extended it for you. You now admit such too. The Faly cost you $375. Not $500. BTW.

I hooked you up with a free $200 animal where I owed you nothing.

David. I know that it sucks when animals die. When they arrive and appear unhealthy. WC's are very prone to immediate issues. But you have to be prudent. You are responsible to work within the agreed upon TOS. Which I extended for you because you seemed new, and I know the passions at work. You were very dedicated, and sincere. I believe you still are.

You made a mistake. And it ended up costing you, and me, about $200, the latter as I attempted to mitigate the loss to you, where I owed you nothing, and I doubt anyone else would have helped you. Be responsible for your choices David. I do not think you a bad person. I have seen you post many times about your love and care for these animals. And your successes. You have some stunning critters now. But own your failures as well. Good luck.

 

[shaunaroxanne]

Shauna. You have to read the thread.

1) The transcripts of the calls were posted.

2) The police report number has been provided, and confirmed by the Polk County Sheriff's Office of Records. You can call them tomorrow.

3) Prior independent evidence of Robert Nichols making harassing phone calls to others has also been posted.

That is for starters.

So Shauna. Do you approve of Robert harassing folks ? Making obscene phone calls to the wives of people he had issues with ? Inquiring minds want to know. Thanks.

I do not agree with anyone harassing people, and I feel that you are doing so as well. Did you say there are official transcripts of the telephone calls? I must have missed that, I'll have to go re-read them. But how do we even know those are authentic? Have they been validated by law enforcement to prove they are actually of Nichols? Innocent until proven guilty, no?

Jim, you try to tear down everyone who does not agree with you. It is not nice. We are good people at CGW. There are troublemakers everywhere, and again, we showed you the PROOF that the admins reprimanded NIchols and he has changed his behavior on CGW.

When I tried to speak to you today on FB, you accused me of supporting the guy who called your mom a ho. That was a blatent lie, I dont even know the guy. You lied to the people here when you said he is one of our most active members, completely untrue. You lied when you said Nichols is a moderator on CGW, he is NOT. You are lying to the people who are supporting you, and when someone finally does go to CGW to see for themselves, the truth will come out. But then you will say things were deleted or changed, because you have an excuse for everything.

 

[caffeinecynic]

I do not agree with anyone harassing people, and I feel that you are doing so as well. Did you say there are official transcripts of the telephone calls? I must have missed that, I'll have to go re-read them. But how do we even know those are authentic? Have they been validated by law enforcement to prove they are actually of Nichols? Innocent until proven guilty, no?

Jim, you try to tear down everyone who does not agree with you. It is not nice. We are good people at CGW. There are troublemakers everywhere, and again, we showed you the PROOF that the admins reprimanded NIchols and he has changed his behavior on CGW.

When I tried to speak to you today on FB, you accused me of supporting the guy who called your mom a ho. That was a blatent lie, I dont even know the guy. You lied to the people here when you said he is one of our most active members, completely untrue. You lied when you said Nichols is a moderator on CGW, he is NOT. You are lying to the people who are supporting you, and when someone finally does go to CGW to see for themselves, the truth will come out. But then you will say things were deleted or changed, because you have an excuse for everything.

Facebook groups have an option to show who the admins are. If you go to the group, select members, and then on the members dropdown, select 'admins', you can see who the actual moderators are. Will you please provide a screenshot of who the moderators of the group are, for records' sake? If Nichols is not one, this will show, and that will support your stance better.

 

[shaunaroxanne]

Facebook groups have an option to show who the admins are. If you go to the group, select members, and then on the members dropdown, select 'admins', you can see who the actual moderators are. Will you please provide a screenshot of who the moderators of the group are, for records' sake? If Nichols is not one, this will show, and that will support your stance better.

Thank you, I have the screenshot, just not sure how to insert it here

 

[hhmoore]

The other side of that coin is that Jim should have gotten that evidence of his claim to back up his side of the story. (Maybe he did, I don't know.) It surely could have saved a lot of hassle and harsh words if that was posted right from the start - especially if things have been "scrubbed" since the start of this thread.

 

[Chameleon Company]

I do not agree with anyone harassing people, and I feel that you are doing so as well. Did you say there are official transcripts of the telephone calls? I must have missed that, I'll have to go re-read them. But how do we even know those are authentic? Have they been validated by law enforcement to prove they are actually of Nichols? Innocent until proven guilty, no?

Jim, you try to tear down everyone who does not agree with you. It is not nice. We are good people at CGW. There are troublemakers everywhere, and again, we showed you the PROOF that the admins reprimanded NIchols and he has changed his behavior on CGW.

When I tried to speak to you today on FB, you accused me of supporting the guy who called your mom a ho. That was a blatent lie, I dont even know the guy. You lied to the people here when you said he is one of our most active members, completely untrue. You lied when you said Nichols is a moderator on CGW, he is NOT. You are lying to the people who are supporting you, and when someone finally does go to CGW to see for themselves, the truth will come out. But then you will say things were deleted or changed, because you have an excuse for everything.

Shauna. I am glad that you do not support harassment. But you are most inaccurate, and insincere. As follows.

1) Rob has a proven history of telephone harassment. And obscene texts. The whole gamut. It is posted already. Yet you say that "You are doing so as well". No Shauna. Stop deflecting. Stop fabricating. Make a thread where I have ever done such to anyone. Or post it here. I have never done such. Shame on you.

2) The proof that Robert Nichols was given Moderator powers is coming. So figure out what to say then, or how you would like your crow seasoned.

The rest is utter nonsense. You are here defending scum. You know the very gals that Rob has harassed. Yet you want some "proof" from me ? I have the proof of his calls to me. So do the cops. So does Verizon Security. I have had two Florida Law Enforcement Officers in my kitchen, listening to it. Just 6 days ago. I do not give a flying you-know-what about your concern for proof. The Mods here know that their current format does not support the file size, and we are working on that, as I would love to post Robert Nichols in his own pathetic voice.

You know Ginger. Ask her. She and others have posted their issues in Central. Is she lying ? That you would even think that I needed to show you some standard of such, especially in light of a valid police report, shows me where your character lies. Run from this Shaunna, if you have any common sense. Would like to think that you are better than this. get away from these a-holes. Tell Robert Rose and Chrissy Lynn to come here, instead of sending their minions.

If you do not run Shauna, then kindly explain why you are here, as it makes no sense. I strongly suggest the former to you. I hope that you learn from this. Quick.

 

[caffeinecynic]

The other side of that coin is that Jim should have gotten that evidence of his claim to back up his side of the story. (Maybe he did, I don't know.) It surely could have saved a lot of hassle and harsh words if that was posted right from the start - especially if things have been "scrubbed" since the start of this thread.

Truth.

Though honestly, I'm a member of some Facebook groups, and there's options within them to allow members to add people - not just administrators - as Shauna, I believe, stated.

I think it was probably just a misunderstanding on how Facebook groups work (which is why I personally never touched on that topic, though I do find it a touch disappointing that the admins never came to explain that themselves).

As for how to attach the screenshot, Shauna - when you go to reply, you'll see a box under Additional Options that reads "Manage Attachments." That's how you attach an image.

 

[Chameleon Company]

The other side of that coin is that Jim should have gotten that evidence of his claim to back up his side of the story. (Maybe he did, I don't know.) It surely could have saved a lot of hassle and harsh words if that was posted right from the start - especially if things have been "scrubbed" since the start of this thread.

Agreed. I should have. But what little was available, as it does not need to be posted outright, was scrubbed in the first few hours of this thread. I went to get it, and had to laugh. Evidence is still forthcoming though. If they were not worried there, they would not have scrubbed Robert's name as they did.

It is all working out quite well.

 

[caffeinecynic]

Agreed. I should have. But what little was available, as it does not need to be posted outright, was scrubbed in the first few hours of this thread. I went to get it, and had to laugh. Evidence is still forthcoming though. If they were not worried there, they would not have scrubbed Robert's name as they did.

It is all working out quite well.

As I've stated before, I have no real horse in this race, but I saw you mention you had proof of your transactions with ibchams, and now you've said this.

I'd like to see this proof, please, and I'm curious as to what the hold up on it is? Do you need help resizing images or anything?