• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

The People's Choice

Would this secret society incorporate any members from The Brotherhood of the Ball? They've got the whole secret society thing down pat.
 
I figured as much...

I posted the following:
Dr Owens said:
Wes,
I know that I might as well be arguing with the wall here, but please show me ONE example where you have been unfairly moderated be me. ONE. Don't beat around the bush about "selective moderation," or how you get picked on more than most. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that whoever breaks the rules the most is going to have the most warning points (and anyone who has been around here for any length of time knows how often you break the rules). Bottom line: just give ONE example of where I gave you warning points unfairly. In other words, either prove your case, or shut up with all of your whining already.
And you responded with:
Wilomn said:
owens, we've been down that road before and frankly, it's not worth the time or the effort to argue the point with you.

I feel one way, you feel another. As staff, you have the backing of the man in charge.

YOUR opinion of whether or not you've been fair, while of some matter, is not one I look to when I want an UNBIASED view.

We don't like eachother.

Let's just leave it with that. You do your thing and I'll do mine.
So, in other words, you can't prove it. Why can't you? Because it's a completely baseless accusation. That's why.

You say, "it's not worth the time or the effort to argue the point with you," yet you spend more time on this forum posting and arguing with people than the vast majority of it's members. Certainly FAR more time than I do. Now all of a sudden it's "not worth the time or the effort." Riiiiggghhhttt. :rolleyes: The bottom line is this...you've been making false statements about me (some people would call those false statements lies) for quite some time. Now I'm asking you to prove it...but you won't (or rather you can't). It's time to either put up or shut up wes. Either prove that what you have said is true, or stop telling lies.
 
Dr Owens said:
I posted the following:
And you responded with:
So, in other words, you can't prove it. Why can't you? Because it's a completely baseless accusation. That's why.

You say, "it's not worth the time or the effort to argue the point with you," yet you spend more time on this forum posting and arguing with people than the vast majority of it's members. Certainly FAR more time than I do. Now all of a sudden it's "not worth the time or the effort." Riiiiggghhhttt. :rolleyes: The bottom line is this...you've been making false statements about me (some people would call those false statements lies) for quite some time. Now I'm asking you to prove it...but you won't (or rather you can't). It's time to either put up or shut up wes. Either prove that what you have said is true, or stop telling lies.
I will ASSume you are posting as a non-mod when I make my following statements to you.

I am in no way obligated to provide that which you have requested and have even gone so far as to explain why.

So, all I have to say is, get bent.
 
Wilomn said:
I will ASSume you are posting as a non-mod when I make my following statements to you.

I am in no way obligated to provide that which you have requested and have even gone so far as to explain why.

So, all I have to say is, get bent.
LMAO!!! :rofl:

I knew that you would have some sort of pathetically weak comeback. Once again, you won't prove the things that you have said about me to be true, because you can't. You lied wes. Plain and simple.
 
Dr Owens said:
LMAO!!! :rofl:

I knew that you would have some sort of pathetically weak comeback. Once again, you won't prove the things that you have said about me to be true, because you can't. You lied wes. Plain and simple.
Been there, done that, ain't playin your game, boyo.

If this is the best baiting you've got you better get used to disappointment.
 
Wilomn said:
Been there, done that, ain't playin your game, boyo.

If this is the best baiting you've got you better get used to disappointment.
Wes,
When have you ever seen me try to bait someone into an argument on this forum? I don't do that. I am simply telling you that you either need to prove that what you have said is true, or stop telling lies. It's really quite simple.
 
Dr Owens said:
Wes,
When have you ever seen me try to bait someone into an argument on this forum? I don't do that. I am simply telling you that you either need to prove that what you have said is true, or stop telling lies. It's really quite simple.
..Eh.
 
Wilomn said:
I will ASSume you are posting as a non-mod when I make my following statements to you.

I am in no way obligated to provide that which you have requested and have even gone so far as to explain why.

So, all I have to say is, get bent.
Awwww gee whiz rich, I thought I was telling owens the member to get bent, I even said so in my post.

How is one to know when he's just a regular member and when he's a mod?

I'm soooooooooooooo confused gosh darn it.
 
Wilomn said:
Oh, did your over inflated self image have you thinking you rated more?

Ah well, as I said, get used to disappointment.
LOL! Wes, you know damn good and well that you have lied repeatedly about me on this forum. Now you're attempting to be dismissive rather than addressing the fact that you lied. That's pretty weak.
 
Wilomn said:
We don't like eachother.
Wes, as someone without a dog in this fight or a pony in this race, I think this sums up at least the gist of your entire perception of the matter. How it started I know not, but it's been going on as long as I have been a member of this site, probably longer. How much Jay doesn't like you is not as much clear to me as how much you don't like him and how much you don't respect him as a moderator. You have made that clear many a time.

I just spent some time reviewing each of your warnings. Now there is half an hour or so I will never get back. :rofl: Most were issued by Rich, and prior to the recent changes, the rest (save one issued by Ken) were issued by Jay. I can't see that I see a big difference qualitatively in the posts for which Rich issued warnings as compared to those for which Jay issued warnings. Were there other posts by other posters that were more deserving? I'm sure that there were. Rich has made clear that such does not matter to him, that his moderators cannot read all posts and are under no obligation to issue warning points. So this "consistency" argument is moot.

Of those issued under the newest rules, I might take exception to some issued by dand, and I have said as much earlier in this thread. Rich has reviewed every one of those, and he has confirmed that all are appropriate. Again, his is really the only opinion that counts.

The site will be run by whatever rules Rich has in place at any given time. While that has been a bit of a moving target, if you know that you will be dinged for calling lucille "loose wheel" and you keep doing it then who is at fault? Certainly not Rich, as he has "signed off" on that.

You have choices. Stay and play by the rules, such as they are at any given time, leave, or keep doing what you are doing. The last of the three will earn you a fine and suspension.
 
Jim, I just said, though I don't recall in which thread, that I am fully aware almost all the time, of what I write.

I suppose it's more of a habit than anything else at this point. I haven't expected to have anything done in a loooooooooooooong time. Still, I find myself doing it.

Eh, it's no big deal no matter how you look at it, it's just a game. Seems there are as many different ways of keeping scores as there are interpretations of the "guidelines" established here.

I know I still chuckle, sometimes at myself to be sure and not always in a good way as I am fully aware of some dumbass posts I've made, but, heh heh heh, I am hardly alone there. Am I? Not meaning you by that, not at all, just ackowledging that I know I'm not alone.

Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming, The People's Choice. Like it matters, but then, this is not and never has been a democracy.

So, I'd go with Dennis and Dennis, Ken, JimO, Shrap, Griz, Lil Johnny Apple lol, Harlad and Randy and without looking at the list that was posted I'm sure I'm leaving some of by accident. And of course those I left of intentionally, of whom there can be no doubt about identity.
 
Wilomn said:
So, I'd go with Dennis and Dennis, Ken, JimO, Shrap, Griz, Lil Johnny Apple lol, Harlad and Randy and without looking at the list that was posted I'm sure I'm leaving some of by accident. And of course those I left of intentionally, of whom there can be no doubt about identity.

Man it's been some time since I have been called that heh :D heh heh
Made me laugh, a good laugh y'all ;) remember this was a just for fun thread
Heck here is another one, I have also been called 'rotten to the core', I could go on and on.

My picks don't matter as I am a mod so I will not post them. It's the members and such posts that should be here.
This thread has turned into a sniping match that should not be, I am interested in what the thoughts are.
 
Wilomn said:
Awwww gee whiz rich, I thought I was telling owens the member to get bent, I even said so in my post.

How is one to know when he's just a regular member and when he's a mod?

I'm soooooooooooooo confused gosh darn it.

Wes, you yourself have stated that you pretty much know what you are posting when you post it, so THIS post either plainly indicates that you are WRONG about yourself, or you are being foot loose and fancy free with the truth.

The entire gist of the posts in this particular thread between Jay and yourself was in reference to the moderator status of Jay on this site and his actions in relation to you. When you told Jay to "get bent", it was EXACTLY because of those moderation actions, and as such, it was blatantly a case of antagonism towards a moderator.

That fact, by your own admission of your own ability to be the word crafter you claim, could not have been overlooked by you. The Mr. Innocent routine just doesn't fly.........

So cut the "game" crap, Wes. To many people, it has stopped being funny, entertaining, or even worth the space your words take up here. You CAN be an asset to this site and your input and comments valuable, as you certainly have in the past. But this latest "dark side" version of you is beginning to far outshadow that value and make a LOT of people view you as a distinct liability to this site for credibility sake. When you stopped concentrating on the bad guys and began targeting ANYONE at all, basically at a whim, or from personal conflicts, your judgment and credibility became suspect in all issues.

FWIW, Wes, FWIW.......... From one member to another.
 
Back
Top