Jim O
Careful with that axe...
Lunch was my best subject in junior high and high school.Stardust said:It is lunch time. Silly you.![]()
Lunch was my best subject in junior high and high school.Stardust said:It is lunch time. Silly you.![]()
Sammy,shrap said:Ahhhhh an enlightened one!!!
Mike Greathouse said:Sammy,
I can see it now.
The Fauna Illuminati Society
We could wear buttons and funny hats and everything....
And you responded with:Dr Owens said:Wes,
I know that I might as well be arguing with the wall here, but please show me ONE example where you have been unfairly moderated be me. ONE. Don't beat around the bush about "selective moderation," or how you get picked on more than most. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that whoever breaks the rules the most is going to have the most warning points (and anyone who has been around here for any length of time knows how often you break the rules). Bottom line: just give ONE example of where I gave you warning points unfairly. In other words, either prove your case, or shut up with all of your whining already.
So, in other words, you can't prove it. Why can't you? Because it's a completely baseless accusation. That's why.Wilomn said:owens, we've been down that road before and frankly, it's not worth the time or the effort to argue the point with you.
I feel one way, you feel another. As staff, you have the backing of the man in charge.
YOUR opinion of whether or not you've been fair, while of some matter, is not one I look to when I want an UNBIASED view.
We don't like eachother.
Let's just leave it with that. You do your thing and I'll do mine.
I will ASSume you are posting as a non-mod when I make my following statements to you.Dr Owens said:I posted the following:
And you responded with:
So, in other words, you can't prove it. Why can't you? Because it's a completely baseless accusation. That's why.
You say, "it's not worth the time or the effort to argue the point with you," yet you spend more time on this forum posting and arguing with people than the vast majority of it's members. Certainly FAR more time than I do. Now all of a sudden it's "not worth the time or the effort." Riiiiggghhhttt.The bottom line is this...you've been making false statements about me (some people would call those false statements lies) for quite some time. Now I'm asking you to prove it...but you won't (or rather you can't). It's time to either put up or shut up wes. Either prove that what you have said is true, or stop telling lies.
LMAO!!!Wilomn said:I will ASSume you are posting as a non-mod when I make my following statements to you.
I am in no way obligated to provide that which you have requested and have even gone so far as to explain why.
So, all I have to say is, get bent.
Been there, done that, ain't playin your game, boyo.Dr Owens said:LMAO!!!![]()
I knew that you would have some sort of pathetically weak comeback. Once again, you won't prove the things that you have said about me to be true, because you can't. You lied wes. Plain and simple.
Wes,Wilomn said:Been there, done that, ain't playin your game, boyo.
If this is the best baiting you've got you better get used to disappointment.
..Eh.Dr Owens said:Wes,
When have you ever seen me try to bait someone into an argument on this forum? I don't do that. I am simply telling you that you either need to prove that what you have said is true, or stop telling lies. It's really quite simple.
Awwww gee whiz rich, I thought I was telling owens the member to get bent, I even said so in my post.Wilomn said:I will ASSume you are posting as a non-mod when I make my following statements to you.
I am in no way obligated to provide that which you have requested and have even gone so far as to explain why.
So, all I have to say is, get bent.
Great comeback there wes. Really impressive.Wilomn said:..Eh.
Oh, did your over inflated self image have you thinking you rated more?Dr Owens said:Great comeback there wes. Really impressive.![]()
LOL! Wes, you know damn good and well that you have lied repeatedly about me on this forum. Now you're attempting to be dismissive rather than addressing the fact that you lied. That's pretty weak.Wilomn said:Oh, did your over inflated self image have you thinking you rated more?
Ah well, as I said, get used to disappointment.
Wes, as someone without a dog in this fight or a pony in this race, I think this sums up at least the gist of your entire perception of the matter. How it started I know not, but it's been going on as long as I have been a member of this site, probably longer. How much Jay doesn't like you is not as much clear to me as how much you don't like him and how much you don't respect him as a moderator. You have made that clear many a time.Wilomn said:We don't like eachother.
Most were issued by Rich, and prior to the recent changes, the rest (save one issued by Ken) were issued by Jay. I can't see that I see a big difference qualitatively in the posts for which Rich issued warnings as compared to those for which Jay issued warnings. Were there other posts by other posters that were more deserving? I'm sure that there were. Rich has made clear that such does not matter to him, that his moderators cannot read all posts and are under no obligation to issue warning points. So this "consistency" argument is moot.Wilomn said:So, I'd go with Dennis and Dennis, Ken, JimO, Shrap, Griz, Lil Johnny Apple lol, Harlad and Randy and without looking at the list that was posted I'm sure I'm leaving some of by accident. And of course those I left of intentionally, of whom there can be no doubt about identity.
Wilomn said:Awwww gee whiz rich, I thought I was telling owens the member to get bent, I even said so in my post.
How is one to know when he's just a regular member and when he's a mod?
I'm soooooooooooooo confused gosh darn it.