John,
I think that most, if not all of us, would agree that there is no proven TSE "fake het scam". Like you, most of us believe it both possible and likely, and perhaps the only real difference between your post and those of others has been the failure by some to use the word "alleged", which we hear so often on the news. Many times its almost comical in its use, as the evidence seems overwhelming, but there has not been a trial yet, and as such the legal advice to the networks is that all is only alleged until proven. I do not think it just idle speculation that exists only in this thread, although this thread did bring together the separate fears of many into a collective concern. It is very much in the minds of those who bought these animals from Chris, have not only spent hundreds if not thousands of dollars, and much time and effort, but now must worry that they have been had. It is important that all owners of hets from TSE know about this speculation, as they may find themselves with a legal claim, and while no one hopes they are fake hets, must prepare themselves in advance for possible legal action. It may only be to investigate their options now, in advance, so that they are not too far behind the curve should they find out they've been defrauded. Agreed again, it is all just speculation, or the "alleged fake het scam", but one thing that all this speculation brought out was the failure of anyone to have received anything from Chris and TSE that would rate even an ounce of being what is called "exculpatory evidence", that being evidence that would lend itself to, if not prove, that there was no fraud. This would be documented bloodlines, pictures, etc. While the final proof is in what hatches, all the evidence that has come out since this speculation began has been anything but exculpatory, with many promised pictures and documentation that never arrived, the multiple sales of the "last animal", etc. To some extent, the lack of anyone coming forward documenting that they sold Chris founding breeders, or verified hets for resale, speaks volumes as well.
We may be in complete agreement, that the only thing that needed clarification is the use of the word "alleged". Otherwise, many of us here feel that given the current evidence, to include the lack of exculpatory evidence, this speculation is not only valid, but necessary. Pro-bono
