Look this stuff up as I don't like feeling like I am the perpetrator of misinformation.
This is a quote from a pbs.org article (I can post the scientific articles too, but you all be snoring before reading them in their entirety!):
"One of the ways in which disease organisms can be transmitted is by being durable in the external environment. If we imagine a disease organism that could last for 10 years in the external environment, even if a person who's infected is immobilized, coughing or sneezing or shedding one way or another, many people may come to that spot in the next 10 years, so that immobilized person could still serve as a source of infection for many susceptible individuals.
What we expect, if that argument's right, is to see an association between how durable the disease organisms are in the external environment and how harmful they are. And that's exactly what we see. At the top of the list is the smallpox virus, which can last, in some cases, for more than 10 years in the external environment, and it's the most damaging of all the respiratory tract infectious agents of humans. Next on the list would be the tuberculosis bacterium, which is also quite durable in the external environment. It's also a very damaging pathogen."
In no way am I saying this virus is akin to any of those stated, but the fact remains that viral diseases and vectors are constantly being studied to better affect treatments for them. As a vet tech I should keep up with those studies, but I have not worked in the field for many years. I will not let myself get too far out of the loop in the future and these kinds of studies are of interest to me.