For those who want to question silly details of timing of vet visits, or whether it is wise to buy water snakes from a wholesaler, or whether they can dig up a scientific journal that calls into question an assumption made years ago, all I can ask is that you stop. Take a deep breath and try to refocus on the issue at hand. Your inability to focus on the issue at hand makes you look silly.
Given that you have not provided any proof to your claim that SFD has extirpated massasaugas in Illinois and the literature provided doesn't support your claim is where you come off as over-reacting and dismissive particularly when you call those kinds of questions as silly. You and how you present your claims are important to whether or not your claim is going to be considered credible and ad hominem attacks even relative mild ones are not going to get you anywhere.
Your attempt to dismiss the peer reviewed documentation as trivial is pretty specious since it calls into question just how long fungal blister type diseases have been present in the wild and pet trade. This may not be a "new" disease but simply an expansion of one that has been present for many decades and is only now becoming identified. As an additional point, if you are calling into question the older peer reviewed literature on nothing more than your personal opinion, you are again losing credibility and in that case the more recent information should be dismissed just as readily. You cannot choose to cherry pick what you think is important and what isn't in your argument.
Your opinions on these trivialities really aren't important right now.
Actually they are important, if you want people to respond positively and proactively then you should avoid insulting them and ignoring questions because you are bothered that people aren't running around like their heads are on fire on your word. Even if this is SFD, then it may still be husbandry related on your part, see the article I linked on water snakes above specifically this article
Lee, Y., et al. "Population monitoring and habitat characterization for the conservation and recovery of the northern population of the copperbelly water snake (Nerodia erythrogaster neglecta). Michigan Natural Features Inventory." Michigan Natural Features Inventory 2007-04 (2007).
where a disease fitting the same description was described in wild snakes and noted that the symptoms are common in captive species as well specifically from that article
We observed the snake again on 20 May and 8 June 2006 when it was captured and brought to the Detroit Zoo for diagnosis and treatment because we observed that the individual’s head and neck were
covered with blisters, and its left eye was filled with pus. The snake had been observed in the same wetland on a buttonbush brush pile. The Detroit Zoo staff has diagnosed this condition as blister disease which is
apparently fairly common among snakes in captivity when the snakes have been exposed to very humid conditions. It is a condition associated with snakes occurring in very humid or wet conditions. Snakes
often recover from blister disease after several sheds. For example, snakes may emerge from hibernation with blister disease but recover after a few sheds.
However, some snakes may have a hard time recovering from blister disease – e,g. if it continues to occur under conditions which caused the blister
disease originally.
I was hoping Underground would jump on here and engage - not about their side of the story - but (as I encouraged them to do) - acknowledge that this is potentially a big deal - not only for their own business, but for our wild herp populations, as well as our captive animals. And also talk about what they plan to do about it.
Your problem is that you aren't sure it is a big deal but you want it to be one, I'm not surprised a vendor doesn't want to engage given your leap off the cliff before you even have the test results back, if the test is negative for SFB and turns out to be a bacterial infection (ala the article I reposted above) what are you going to do about the negative attention you directed to a company and the hobby? Don't get me wrong, SFD is serious since we don't know the reason for it becoming so prevalent in the wild but as I noted above there are more than 50 years of descriptions in the literature for snakes with a similar symptom and we don't know if they are the same or not at this time. (I can't remember if it was blister disease or mouth rot Carl Kauffield in Snakes and Snake Hunting (1957) said there was no cure and to release the snake hoping it would cure itself or I would have used that as well as an example).
I'm a pretty rational guy. So those who want to throw the "hysterical" or "sky is falling" spear I'd ask you to reconsider - maybe double check your own motivation for your accusations. This may may a big deal, but more likely it is another step in what will eventually (and slowly) be a ban on interstate movement of native, and/or possibly exotic, herp species.
If it is SFD, why would it have to be slow? USFW could simply add the disease to the injurious list just like Bsal and ban the potential movement of the vector (the animal).
All we can do here is try to focus on the bigger issue - maybe including the role that large scale collectors, importers, wholesalers have on this emerging disease - and try not to get bogged down in the minutia.Joe
Its clear that the only thing you think is the big picture is what you are running around yelling about before you have even confirmed it. If you were that worried about it, you wouldn't have been self-treating the animals but would have sought veterinary assistance in the beginning. Did you consider that your naturalistic set-up could have made the issue worse as it enabled cross reinfection of a pathogen(s) as the animals were all back in contact with each other, exposed to greater humidity and potentially establishing the pathogen in the substrate, preventing the self clearance seen in C. horridus? Did you think to look at your husbandry technique to ensure that you would not be vectoring between cages to enable infection and reinfection? Not all disinfectants work on SFD ...
Don't attempt to denigrate the questions because they are inconvenient as your ability to present the case depends on your response.
some comments
Ed
