Suncoast Herpetological said:I would be hard pressed to find an example to back up your theory that did not fit into the following parameters.
Category One: Cutting Someone Slack
1.) The individual has a long term good reputation
2.) The individual immediately takes responsibility and makes every effort to right the deal
Category Two: Going For the Throat
1.) The individual has no reputation to aid him in initial public opinion
2.) The individual takes a defensive stance and denies any responsibility
3.) The individual immediately becomes a raging ass and tries to make the incident into a joke.
4.) The individual has such a crappy rep already that he is fighting a difficult uphill battle
I would seriously like to see a couple of definitive examples Greg but I am not going to hold my breath. I genuinely don't think you can produce one.
Cliques will always exist in a community of this sort. As someone stated earlier, likeminded people tend to gravitate to one another. Well known individuals with a long positive history will, of course, receive a bit more benefit of the doubt than an unknown. Is it fair? No. Is it inevitable human nature? Of course
However, it is almost always the way someone responds to a bad guy post about them that dictates the way they are received and treated on the BOI.
The measure of a "good guy" is not that he never has a problem, it is in how he deals with and repairs the problem
Gosh I wish I had written that, it's great.


.... all disagereements can not be solved... i mean ok some people react to non confrontational comunication however for some it just doesnt get through that thick skull and thats when the bluntness needs to come out(and oddly just to get a point enough)