Maybe they need to wait until the vet's office opens on Monday so they can get the correct stationery to create their own report?
An honest seller would simply fax in the written permission to the vet, so suspecting documentation is a valid thought, when like in the present case it was promised but not posted.
Yes an honest seller would, but we've all seen how some are not so honest. But again if it's a legit vet, we can't just assume. They could have also been saying they'd post the report and waiting on an appointment? I had to wait a week to get my one snake in when she was given to me with a messed up nose. It took a couple days for me to get in with Tyson the retic I rescued even though he had a horrific injury to his mouth from previous owners.
Elexis, you are not making a clear point and seem to be arguing with yourself.
Please explain this statement, Lucille
Whoever went to the vet needs to provide the written permission to that vet, to share critter info with another .
Ok, so a month and a half, I don't know chams but is it possible for a cham to get the swollen limbs and such of mbd in that amount of time?
Pretty convenient that he'd let the simple act of paying for a service be his justification for why a vet. would lack objectivity. Let's factor into the current scenario the fact that his "partner" is a vet. - presumably to be the one officially making the report? If we can't trust the word of an unrelated professional who's been paid to render a service, how can we possibly trust the word of someone with whom there's a direct business relationship?
So if the original report says tomorrow or Tuesdays date, I will believe they received healthy chams and let them develop that disease to further their scam. Unless the vet actually says it's very severe and could not have progressed that much in that short amount of time, but somehow I doubt that will happen. We've all asked them several questions left unanswered.
