I am not defending Neil. I do not even know Neil except for what I have read of him here and one email "conversation" by which I asked him a cornsnake genetics question that he was not fully able to answer.
I have no clue whatsoever as to the medicinal effects of his urine (nor do I care to investigate!<img src="http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt='

'>. I do not accept his word as gospel, and he is certainly no god of mine!
However, there are some accusations being thrown around by several people who are personally involved in one way or another, and there has been precious little proof offered by any of them. As for Neil's proof, I would like to see the police reports he has filed. Even so, as an insurance broker, I believe fully that he did NOT receive a claim payment on his first burglary without a police report of some sort. Also, I think everyone who has posted has agreed that a report has been filed on the most recent burglary because (according to Neil's accusers) the alarm went off in his store.
All I have ever said in any of this is that someone is lying, and before I believe Dave and his gang I want to see some solid proof of their assertions. The reason I single them out is because they struck the first blow. They made the affirmative assertions concerning Neil's part in the robberies, and the onus is upon them to prove it.
I have asked Rich in my previous post to establish Dave's credibility concerning Neil threatening to suit him. I again ask, "If Neil never threatened to suit Rich directly, what good could he hope to achieve AFTER the PI report was posted?" If the report will be as damning as Dave would have us all to believe, I see no reason to suit Rich after the fact without first trying to dissuade him from posting it in the first place. If Neil has made no such threat and the ONLY info Rich has on this matter is that which has come from Dave, I submit that we are back where we started!
If Dave has the proof, LET US SEE IT! I will be the first in line to form a firing squad for Neil's immediate demise in the herp world. Neil cannot prove that Dave is lying except to show the police reports he has made, but even then that simply means that Neil reported his own theft he committed (according to Dave). Dave (supposedly) can PROVE Neil is lying, but Neil cannot PROVE this of Dave. I say, he who has the proof has the burden of releasing it to us all or SHUT UP!
Darin