There are frequently discussions that occur as byproducts of the main theme in BOI threads. While some may be put out by David's comments about the BOI, and the people that post here, I suspect that relatively few have lost sight of your issues. Even if they did, the REAL problem has been re-iterated multiple times by various people...and, whether you choose to agree or not, that problem may well go beyond YOUR situation in they eyes of many here.
The concern over this being a possible indicator of how David will address customer service issues in the future - especially those that concern money - is something that will not be taken lightly. The decisions that people are making - here, in this thread, and as a result of it - are because of their response to David not dealing with the issue at hand. Consider it a form of moral support.
Harald,
While I do see where you are coming from, I guess the issue here is with a select few people not seeing what David did with his post. He almost won. He was slick enough to respond to the issue at hand some made up emails to try to show how "easy" it is to fake things (which he was called out on), one small paragraph of lies of so-called proof of his stance on the issue (which he was called out on), then turned the entire focus onto his dislike/disrespect for the BOI and those who post on it. Smart man if you think about it. It took the attention for SOME (not ALL) from how he handles business transactions (or the possibility of how he will handle them in the future) to his disdain for something that many have come to love (for lack of a better term) and respect (the BOI). I am NOT saying the people who have seemed to have shifted focus to that issue are not supporting us or the issue at hand, but I think it is being done in a round-about, and maybe not intentional, way. I can point out SOME who have specifically stated that they will not deal with Reptster services because of his disrespect to the BOI and it's members, and that it the ONLY reason they state they are boycotting him and his services. Are they wrong in their thinking? No.
And maybe we (Matthew and I) are just seeing things in a different way because we HAVE been screwed by him, and it HAS hurt us and our show in ways that most may not realize. We were counting on that money, and we have had to figure out how to make up for it. We are not rich people, Matthew makes decent money, but he also supports a family of 7 on that money, so there is not a lot of extra to go around, if any, so any extra out of pocket expenses we had needed to be covered, and that was part of what we were counting on with Mr. Young's sponsorship. We have had to cancel plans for things we really wanted to do because we were counting on that money to fund those activities, including a radio station coming out to do a remote broadcast to help advertise things the very day of the show. Has anyone ever looked into how much that costs? WELL over $750. We DID put out extra money to advertise Reptster, although some might not think so - we had to totally redo our fliers (we had plenty without his name on them), which cost us money, including the cost of going from black and white to color (it's a big difference). It was a lot of time invested that could have been spent in other ways towards the show. And all he needed to do was send us a simple email.
Maybe we have seen a pattern here that has yet to be acknowledge in what he did with Mr. Sanders and the snake deal. Did no one else notice the time frame? Did no one else realize he was telling Mr. Sanders that he did not have the funds to pay him in July after he agreed that he would send funds to us for the sponsorship? Look at the dates. It is all out there. But people have been so wrapped up in other things that Mr. Sanders' issue has yet to even be mentioned by anyone than Mr. Sanders himself, and by Matthew.
Maybe we are concerned that there are other people out there who have had this happen to them. There was already mention of another entity who was "tricked into advertising without paying for it" by Chuck WAY in the beginning, and no one seemed to pick up on it, or at least acknowledge that they did. Doesn't anyone wonder what is going on with that?
Didn't anyone else notice how Steve J was posting about the issues with discrepancies in shipping weights? I mean really, if Mr. Young charged (for example) Steve $10 for shipping, and FedEx only charged Mr. Young $5, isn't Steve entitled to that difference so MAYBE he can choose to give it back to his customer, or maybe cover shipping materials costs that he normally doesn't think about, especially with such a nice discount? I am only using Steve as an example because he pointed out the differences. I have no idea what he would have done with the refund.
I guess I personally feel that too much of the shift has been sent towards Mr. Young's insults of the BOI and it's members by some people, and the ISSUES (yes, plural) that he has caused people are starting to slip under the radar faster and faster. THAT is what is bothering me the most.
Kelly Kordek