beakgeek
I'm a Tangerine Baldy
Funny....it lasted about 30 seconds before Ginger deleted it.
hill4803 said:maybe you can explain why one (actually several) posts I made about the AAA reptile photos (the infamous "blue blizzards") were deleted. I think I already know...I mentioned to the person who started the thread that they should check the FAUNA BOI before making a purchase. I don't see that as a violation of the kingsnake TOS. But, you seem to know the TOS so well, can you cut/paste that part here for me. I haven't complained about the deletion of Garrick's post, if he violated the TOS, it should have been deleted. I do have a problem with the SELECTIVENESS with which some posts are being deleted & some are not.
WebSlave said:I can tell you for a fact that the above quote from ks is not true. I contacted just about everyone at ks when FaunaClassifieds and my other domain names got banned, and my login account deleted and NOT A SINGLE SOUL would discuss with me why that happened. The best I could get was for them to say that it was a "business decision" by the owner, and of course my emails to him went unanswered.
ragnew said:Yeps, his posts were deleted... Then any and all posts referring to why his posts were deleted as well. Come to think of it, anything referring to Garrick was deleted actually...
Then.... a bunch of us got banned from KS. Oh well, this place is better anyway... hehe.
lilroach56 said:What garrick did was advertising, he ASKED for offers and said he was SELLING them. On the BP and Boa forum, NO ONE ASKS for offers.
Would not it be presumptuious to think that perhaps the legal wranglings and all that chaff going on between the deux is the reason for the lack of a response from jeffie himself? Have his lawyers talk to your lawyers kinda deal?
Those "other disruptive posts" were being made by people that were wondering why Garricks posts were deleted in the first place... Did you even see his first post? By the way your talking about it, I'd have to say no.Wraith said:ok how about thinking from this angle: garrick reposted those wonderful photos within threads made by other people which had been designed to cause nothing but more disruption on the forum (a violation) so of course those people's posts were going to get pulled. It's been said by the moderators in the past on forums where fights have happened before that if someone creates a thread and that post violates the rules then all the posts that responded to the original post get trashed with it. If he goes and starts a new thread of his own and reposts the photos and doesn't include anything that could be seen as advertising or other violations then he shouldn't have a problem at all!
Adrian
Snakebyt said:i read the Garrick post, he did not advertise. he gave a link to his site for more pics, and he stated that he would be taking bids on them. Its not like that wouldnt have come up in the thread anyway, you know if he wouldnt have put that in the thread there would have been a dozen replies asking about availability and pricing. this way he saved everyone asking and just answered the question.
And since he is a forum sponsor, i think he has paid for the right to post what he did. As for being hypocritical, as i stated before, he has PAID for that right.
and as for the nasty pics on there.. i wonder if they are planning on keeping them up there all day.. Cant you tell that they have great mods over there, leaving disturbing stuff up there for all to see..there really on top of things...