• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Kingsnake NEEDS THEIR HEAD EXAMINED!!!!

Geez....

Man, oh man.... Sounds like it all hit the fan eh? So, what exactly happened? Fill us ones that couldn't be here in please.
 
Wow record time.

I posted a reponse over on ks to the moderators post. It lasted a couple of minutes. I am telling you anything with the word "fauna" gets deleted faster then you know what slides out of a goose! For ritchie: early this morning some knucklehead using the screen name kingsnake sucks posted some silly stuff: "nazi's" & stuff about not posting on kS anymore, but then they also posted some REALLY lewd pics. That stuff stayed up until sometime in the afternoon. Oh, and Robin (R2 reptiles) posted her dislike of the situation. Some other people also posted, I can't remember everyone. It all got deleted in the afternoon. I have posted stuff about people coming here if they have questions but it keeps getting deleted. I think they are really watching that forum closely now! Darn rowdy leopard gecko people!
 
Oh, I see...

Thanks for the reply... Crazy, crazy stuff. Well, with luck no youngsters checked out the pics that people are talking about.... That would be a real bummer....

I think its great that Robin and others posted their opinions over there as well. Maybe KS will start to open their eyes a little bit wider... Who knows.

Only time will tell...
 
Wow...yeah...I won't be using KS again...the quotes terry took from KS weer directed towards me after I said that people were just angry because Garrett's post was singled out, and then a bunch of people were banned....I responded by asking how she would know what I knew about the deleted posts or people banned...how did she know I hadn't spoken with them about it. Guess what........that post was deleted...
 
man Chad, you are getting good at starting these controversial threads, first the giant thread, now this....:)

At least it is livening up the forum a bit, getting people to posting
 
Hey Stina...

Just so you know, his name is Garrick not Garrett....lol
 
WHOOPS!!!!!!!

I knew that!!!! I thought something seemed funny when I typed garrett...but I really wasn't thinking about it...LOL
 
Re: Hey Adrian...

hill4803 said:
maybe you can explain why one (actually several) posts I made about the AAA reptile photos (the infamous "blue blizzards") were deleted. I think I already know...I mentioned to the person who started the thread that they should check the FAUNA BOI before making a purchase. I don't see that as a violation of the kingsnake TOS. But, you seem to know the TOS so well, can you cut/paste that part here for me. I haven't complained about the deletion of Garrick's post, if he violated the TOS, it should have been deleted. I do have a problem with the SELECTIVENESS with which some posts are being deleted & some are not.
Click to expand...

Bad mouthing or attacking individuals or companies comes to mind and insinuating that AAA doctor their photos likely falls under that catagory I guess it all depends on how such insinuations were worded. As for the BOI it's a no brainer... kingsnake reguarly bleeps out the url as they don't like this or any of rich's sites mentioned there and those posts regularly get yanked and if someone tries to get around the filters through creative spelling. Sometimes the creative spelling types sneak through and sometimes they don't and *if* they get caught those posts certainly get trashed.

Adrian
 
WebSlave said:
I can tell you for a fact that the above quote from ks is not true. I contacted just about everyone at ks when FaunaClassifieds and my other domain names got banned, and my login account deleted and NOT A SINGLE SOUL would discuss with me why that happened. The best I could get was for them to say that it was a "business decision" by the owner, and of course my emails to him went unanswered.
Click to expand...

Would not it be presumptuious to think that perhaps the legal wranglings and all that chaff going on between the deux is the reason for the lack of a response from jeffie himself? Have his lawyers talk to your lawyers kinda deal?

Adrian
 
Thanks for all your help Adrian...

I already talked with the mod, she cleared some stuff up for me. By the way, I never trashed AAA reptiles or insinuated anything. I outright stated that the picture was not accurate & the geckos would not be blue.
 
i think..

that if KS was the Titanic, it would be sinking like a rock! I mean at times people on there just go nuts over the stupidest things. I think they should just reboot the site and clear all of the forums. just me 2cents.
 

Attachments

  • freddy face.jpg
    freddy face.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 113
ragnew said:
Yeps, his posts were deleted... Then any and all posts referring to why his posts were deleted as well. Come to think of it, anything referring to Garrick was deleted actually...

Then.... a bunch of us got banned from KS. Oh well, this place is better anyway... hehe.
Click to expand...

ok how about thinking from this angle: garrick reposted those wonderful photos within threads made by other people which had been designed to cause nothing but more disruption on the forum (a violation) so of course those people's posts were going to get pulled. It's been said by the moderators in the past on forums where fights have happened before that if someone creates a thread and that post violates the rules then all the posts that responded to the original post get trashed with it. If he goes and starts a new thread of his own and reposts the photos and doesn't include anything that could be seen as advertising or other violations then he shouldn't have a problem at all!

Adrian
 
Or they can just get new mods that are overwhelmed with the power they have to ban people and delete threads....
 
lilroach56 said:
What garrick did was advertising, he ASKED for offers and said he was SELLING them. On the BP and Boa forum, NO ONE ASKS for offers.
Click to expand...

Jake's got it right, let's not forget that.
 
Hi Adrian

Just out of curiosity who exactly are you? Could you give us a little background. I don't recall ever even seeing you before!!! Are you a regular on KS? A moderator over there? Shareholder? Good friend of the founder? Please elaborate.
 
Jake does not have it right...

Garrick was not selling his geckos. He very specifically stated he was trying to get an idea of their value, but they were NOT for sale. I know if I owned them I would be keeping 'em & breeding 'em, cause ain't no one else got 'em! He probably could have worded his post better, but that is neither here nor there...
 
Would not it be presumptuious to think that perhaps the legal wranglings and all that chaff going on between the deux is the reason for the lack of a response from jeffie himself? Have his lawyers talk to your lawyers kinda deal?
Click to expand...

Yes, very "presumptuious". Those contacts I attempted were long before any "legal wranglings" and attorneys were involved.
 
Wraith said:
ok how about thinking from this angle: garrick reposted those wonderful photos within threads made by other people which had been designed to cause nothing but more disruption on the forum (a violation) so of course those people's posts were going to get pulled. It's been said by the moderators in the past on forums where fights have happened before that if someone creates a thread and that post violates the rules then all the posts that responded to the original post get trashed with it. If he goes and starts a new thread of his own and reposts the photos and doesn't include anything that could be seen as advertising or other violations then he shouldn't have a problem at all!

Adrian
Click to expand...
Those "other disruptive posts" were being made by people that were wondering why Garricks posts were deleted in the first place... Did you even see his first post? By the way your talking about it, I'd have to say no.

As far as Garricks posting the pics in other threads that were being used in a disruptive way, well, thats where I'd have posted them if I were Garrick. It fits the topic does it not?

Sure, Garrick could have made a brand new thread and posted the pics, but in the long run they'd have been deleted as well. I don't think you get it, this isn't only about Garricks posts being deleted, its about ANY post that was made pretaining to Garrick or why Garricks posts were gone being deleted... Hell, even posts offering someones explanation as to why the posts were deleted were trashed... If thats not lame, I don't know what is...

And finally, Garrick wasn't advertising in the first place (IMO). All I noticed was a breeder that had the RIGHT to post something that he was proud of... If I produced a blazing blizzard (regardless of strain) I'd do the same thing...

Bottom line in my opinion... Kingsnake sucks, and if things don't change it will continue to suck for days, weeks, months and years to come...

Nuff said from here....
 
Snakebyt said:
i read the Garrick post, he did not advertise. he gave a link to his site for more pics, and he stated that he would be taking bids on them. Its not like that wouldnt have come up in the thread anyway, you know if he wouldnt have put that in the thread there would have been a dozen replies asking about availability and pricing. this way he saved everyone asking and just answered the question.
And since he is a forum sponsor, i think he has paid for the right to post what he did. As for being hypocritical, as i stated before, he has PAID for that right.

and as for the nasty pics on there.. i wonder if they are planning on keeping them up there all day.. Cant you tell that they have great mods over there, leaving disturbing stuff up there for all to see..there really on top of things...
Click to expand...

Obviously you have no concept of what "advertising" means. Garrick in the process of posting his beautiful photos also took that message a step further by advertiseing which is against the rules. He was soliciting others for a potential sale by publicly announcing he was taking bids/offers on his animals. No matter how you look at it that is defined as advertising. Paying for advertising space means banner ads, classified forums or sponsorships...it does not mean he or anyone else has a right to post ads on the discussion forums. The discussion forums are for discussion not advertising and such statements to that effect are on all the forums including the leo forum.

This forum is for informational purposes only and is moderated. We ask that you refrain from making personal attacks against individuals or companies. Anything considered disruptive, abusive or obscene will be removed. You may read the Terms of Service here. Advertising anything, except for events, is prohibited here. You may visit our Classifieds area for your advertising needs.


advertise: v.t. & i. 1) make a public announcement of; give information concerning. 2) praise or otherwise promote, as in selling wares.

Adrian
 
Back
Top